Tag Archives: Self-Improvement

Publishing Update

Robert F. Mullen, PhD
Director/ReChanneling

For each new subscriber, ReChanneling donates $25 for workshop scholarships.

Publishing Update
AI Generated: Table of Contents | Publishing Update

Publishing Update

We forwarded our book, A Survivor’s Common-Sense Approach to Recovery from Social Anxiety to the publisher. At this stage, we do not yet have an estimated release date.

The publisher has asked us to refrain from sharing any of the book’s content until we receive formal approval. However, we are permitted to publish the table of contents, which should give readers a general idea of what to expect in the book.

Caveat

The primary distinction between social anxiety and social anxiety disorder lies in the severity of symptoms experienced. Not everyone is affected in the same way. The intensity and persistence of symptoms can vary greatly from person to person. Although the characteristics and traits of these conditions may appear similar across individuals, each person’s experience is shaped by a unique combination of environment, life experiences, and the diversity of human thought and behavior.

Additionally, it is important to recognize that comorbidities—other mental health conditions that occur alongside social anxiety—are highly prevalent. This reality highlights the complex nature of these anxiety disorders. As such, effective recovery strategies must address not only social anxiety, social phobia, and social anxiety disorder, but also the multiple related conditions that often coexist. Throughout this book, when recovery methods are discussed for one of these conditions, they are intended to apply broadly to all three.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

PART I: ACCOUNTABILITY

Chapter One: It’s Not Our Fault
Chapter Two: Trust the Process
Chapter Three: Always Being Right
Chapter Four: The Examined Life
Chapter Five: The Destructive Nature of Blame

PART II: NEUROPLASTICITY

Chapter Six: Feeding Our Neural Network
Chapter Seven: The Sky is Falling
Chapter Eight: Reconstructing Our Neural Network
Chapter Nine: Control Fallacies
Chapter Ten: Hemispheric Synchronization
Chapter Eleven: Emotional Reasoning

PART III: SELF-ESTEEM

Chapter Twelve: Reclaiming and Rebuilding Our Self-Esteem
Chapter Thirteen: Filtering and Polarized Thinking
Chapter Fourteen: The Importance of a Character Resume
Chapter Fifteen: Stop and Smell the Roses
Chapter Sixteen: Defense Mechanisms and Social Anxiety     
Chapter Seventeen: Fallacy of Fairness and Heaven’s Reward Fallacy

PART IV: FEAR-RELATED SITUATIONS

Chapter Eighteen: Origins of Our Automatic Negative Thoughts
Chapter Nineteen: Identifying Fear-Related Situations
Chapter Twenty: Coping Strategies for Anticipated Situations
Chapter Twenty-One: Visualization and Suggestion
Chapter Twenty-Two: Fear Situation Plan

PART V: COPING STRATEGIES

Chapter Twenty-Three: Key Coping Strategies
Chapter Twenty-Four: All-Purpose Coping Strategies
Chapter Twenty-Five: Labeling
Chapter Twenty-Six: Relationships
Chapter Twenty-Seven: Personalization

Chapter Twenty-Eighteen: The Spotted Leopard

APPENDICES

A: Character Strengths, Virtues, and Attributes
B: Character Resume
C: Fear Situation Plan
D. Symptoms and Traits of Social Anxiety
Sources

Proactive Neuroplasticity YouTube Series

Social Anxiety Workshops With Dr. Robert F. Mullen | Rechanneling.com

WHY IS YOUR SUPPORT SO NECESSARY? 
ReChanneling develops and conducts programs to alleviate the symptoms of social anxiety and help individuals tap into their innate potential for extraordinary living. Our unique approach focuses on understanding personality through empathy and collaboration, integrating neuroscience and psychology. This includes proactive neuroplasticity, cognitive-behavioral modification, positive psychology, and techniques designed to reclaim and rebuild self-esteem. Every contribution, no matter the size, supports individuals striving to make a positive change in their own lives and the lives of others. All donations go towards scholarships for groups and workshops.

Social Anxiety’s Failure to Establish, Develop, and Maintain Healthy Relationships. Part II

REVIEW PART I HERE

Robert F. Mullen, PhD
Director/ReChanneling

For each new subscriber, ReChanneling donates $25 for workshop scholarships.

Social Anxiety’s Failure to Establish, Develop, and Maintain Healthy Relationships. Part II
AI Generated: Relationships | Social Anxiety’s Failure to Establish, Develop, and Maintain Healthy Relationships. Part II

The distinction between social anxiety and social anxiety disorder is in severity. We are not all affected by the same symptoms or relentlessness. The characteristics and traits are equivalent. These conditions originate homogeneously, their trajectories differentiated by environment, experience, and the diversity of human thought and behavior. While comorbidities dramatically benefit, the recovery methods identified are for social anxiety and social anxiety disorder, and reference to one includes the other.

Recent Posts

I recognize that I have fallen behind on my weekly posts. We have been finalizing editing of our upcoming book, A Survivor’s Common Sense Approach to Recovery from Social Anxiety, which goes to the publisher next week. Accounting for the average four-month schedule to get to print, we hope to make this book available sometime in the spring.

Social Anxiety’s Failure to Establish, Develop, and Maintain Healthy Relationships. Part II

From C.-H. Mayer and E. Vanderheiden (eds), International Handbook of Love. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025. 10.1007/978-3-031-76665-7_59-1

Categories of Interpersonal Love

In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle. (1999) encapsulates love as “a sort of excess of feeling.” Utilizing the classic Greek categories of interpersonal love is vital to this study; each classification illustrates how SAD symptoms thwart the subject’s means of acquisition in seven of eight categories (except healthy philautia ).

The three primary categories, (1) philia (comradeship), (2) eros (sexual), and (3) agape (selfless and unconditional), are followed by (4) storge (family), (5) ludus (provocative), (6) pragma (practical), and the two extremes of philautia: (7) narcissistic and (8) positive self-qualities. Forms of inanimate love are excluded from this study, “including love for experiences (meraki), objects (érōs), and places (chōros)” (Lomas, 2017):

Philia

Aristotle called philia “one of the most indispensable requirements of life” (Grewal, 2016). Philia is a bonding of individuals with mutual experiences—a “warm affection in intimate friendship” (Helm, 2017). This platonic love subsists on shared experience and personal disclosure. A core symptom of a SAD person is the fear of revealing something that will make them appear “boring, stupid or incompetent” (Ades & Dias, 2013). Even the anticipation of interaction causes “significant anxiety, fear, self-consciousness, and embarrassment” (Richards, 2014) because of the fear of being scrutinized or judged by others (Mayoclinic, 2017b).

Eros

Eros is reciprocal feelings of shared arousal between people physically attracted to each other, the fulfillment declared by the sexual act. The SAD person’s self-image of undesirability and fears of intimacy (Montesi et al., 2013) and rejection (Tsitsas & Paschali, 2014) has significant consequences in terms of acquiring a sexual partner and satisfaction of the sexual act. SAD’s culture of maladaptive self-appraisal poses severe challenges to their ability to establish, develop, and maintain romantic relationships (Cuncic, 2018; Topaz, 2018). A study by Montesi et al. (2013), examining the SAD person’s symptomatic fear of intimacy and sexual communication concluded “socially anxious individuals experience less sexual satisfaction in their intimate partnerships than nonanxious individuals, a relationship that has been well documented in previous research.” The study reported a lacuna of literature, however, examining the sexual communication of SAD persons.

Agape

Through the universal mandate to love thy neighbor, the concept of agape embraces unconditional love that transcends and persists regardless of circumstance (Helm, 2017). SAD generally infects adolescents who have experienced detachment, exploitation, and or neglect (Steele, 1995). This form of love characterizes itself through unselfish giving; the SAD person’s maladaptive self-belief that she or he is the constant focus of attention is a form of self-centeredness bordering on narcissism (Mayoclinic, 2017a).

Storge

Again, the primary cause of SAD stems from childhood hereditary, environmental (Felman, 2018; NAMI, 2019), or traumatic events (Mayoclinic, 2017b). In each case, the SAD person is exploited (unconsciously or otherwise) in the formative stages of human motivational development: physiological safety, belongingness, and love (Maslow, 1943). As a result, storge or familial love and protection, vital to the healthy development of the family unit, are severely affected. The exploited adolescent (Steele, 1995) faces serious challenges recognizing or embracing familial love as an adolescent or adult.

Ludus

The SAD persons’ conflict with the provocative playfulness of ludus is evident in the fear of being judged and negatively evaluated by others (Mayoclinic, 2017b) as well as themselves (Hulme et al., 2012; Ritter et al., 2013). Persons experiencing SAD do not find social interaction pleasurable (Richards, 2019) and have limited expectations that things will work out advantageously (Mayoclinic, 2017b). Finally, SAD persons’ maladaptive self-beliefs generally result in inappropriate behavior in social situations (Kampmann et al., 2019).

Pragma

The obvious synonym for pragma is practicality—a balanced and constructive quality counterintuitive to someone whose modus operandi is discordant thought and behavior (Richards, 2014; Zimmerman et al., 2010). Pragma is mutual interests and goals securing a working and endurable partnership facilitated by rational behavior and expectation. The SAD personality sustains itself through irrationality (Felman, 2018) and maladaptive self-beliefs (Hulme et al., 2012; Ritter et al., 2013). The pragmatic individual deals with relationships sensibly and realistically, conforming to typical standards. The overriding objective of a SAD person is to “avoid situations that most people consider ‘normal’” (WebMD, 2019).

Dr. Mullen is doing impressive work helping the world. He is the
pioneer of proactive neuroplasticity, utilizing DRNI – deliberate,
repetitive, neural information. – WeVoice (Madrid, Málaga)  

The onset of SAD is a consequence of early psychophysiological disturbance (Mayoclinic, 2017a). The receptive juvenile might be the product of bullying (Felman, 2018), abuse (NAMI, 2019), or a broken home. Perhaps parental behaviors are overprotective or controlling or do not provide emotional validation (Cuncic, 2018).

Subsequently, the SAD person finds it difficult to let their guard down and express vulnerability, even with someone they love and trust (Cuncic, 2018). Alden et al. (2018) note that SAD persons “find it difficult, in their intimate relationships, to be able to self-disclose, to reciprocate the affection others show toward them.”

There is a large body of research linking love with positive mental and physical health outcomes (Rodebaugh et al., 2015). Relationships, love, and associations with others lead one to recognition of their value to society “and motivates them towards building communities, culture and work for the welfare of others” (Capon & Blakely, 2007).

Love is developed through social connectedness. Social connectedness, essential to personal development, is one of the central psychological needs “required for better psychological development and well-being” (Deci & Ryan, 2000). Social connectedness plays a significant role as mediator in the relationship between SAD and interpersonal love (Lee et al., 2008) and is strongly associated with the level of self-esteem (Fatima et al., 2018).

Philautia

The seventh and eighth categories of interpersonal love are the two extremes of philautia: narcissism and positive self-qualities. To Aristotle, healthy philautia is vigorous “in both its orientation to self and to others” due to its inherent virtue (Grewal, 2016). “By contrast, its darker variant encompasses notions such as narcissism, arrogance and egotism” (Lomas, 2017). In its positive aspect, any interactivity “has beneficial consequences, whereas in the latter case, philautia will have disastrous consequences” (Fialho, 2007):

The good man should be a lover of self (for he will both himself profit by doing noble acts, and will benefit his fellows), but the wicked man should not; for he will hurt both himself and his neighbors, following as he does evil passions. (Grewal, 2016)

Unhealthy Philautia

Unhealthy philautia is akin to borderline narcissism—a mental condition in which people function with an “inflated sense of their own importance [and a] deep need for excessive attention and admiration.” Behind this mask of extreme confidence, the Mayoclinic Report (2017a) states “lies a fragile self-esteem that’s vulnerable to the slightest criticism.” SAD persons live on the periphery of morbid self-absorption through their self-centeredness. Their obsession with excessive attention (ADAA, 2019b) mirrors that of unhealthy philautia.

In Classical Greece, persons could be accused of unhealthy philautia if they placed themselves above the greater good. Today, hubris refers to “an inflated sense of one’s status, abilities, or accomplishments, especially when accompanied by haughtiness or arrogance” (Burton, 2016). The self-centeredness and self-absorption of a SAD person often present themselves as arrogance; in fact, the words are synonymous. The critical difference is that SAD persons do not possess an inflated sense of their own importance but one of insignificance.

Healthy Philautia

Aquinas’ (1981) response to demons and disorder states “Evil cannot exist without good.” The Greeks believed that the narcissism of unhealthy philautia would not exist without its complementary opposition to healthy philautia, commonly interpreted as the self-esteeming virtue—an unfortunate and wholly incomplete definition. Rather than only focusing on self-esteem, philautia incorporates the broader spectrum of all positive self-qualities:

Rather, we are concerned here with various positive qualities prefixed by the term self, including -esteem, -efficacy, -reliance, -compassion, and -resliance. Aristotle argued in Nichomachean Ethics that self-love is a precondition for all other forms of love. (Lomas, 2017)

Positive self-qualities determine one’s relation to self, others, and the world. They recognize that one is of value, consequential, and worthy of love. “Philautia is important in every sphere of life and can be considered a basic human need” (Sharma, 2014). To the Greeks, philautia “is the root of the heart of all the other loves” (Jericho, 2015). Gadamer (2009) writes of philautia: “Thus it is; in self-love one becomes aware of the true ground and the condition for all possible bonds with others and commitment to oneself.” Healthy philautia is the love that is within oneself. It is not, explains Jericho (2015), “the desire for self and the root of selfishness.” Ethicist John Deigh (2001) writes:

Accordingly, when Aristotle remarks that a man’s friendly relations with others come from his relations with himself … he is making the point that self-love (philautia ), as the best exemplar of love … is the standard by which to judge the friendliness of the man’s relations with others.

Positive self-qualities are obscured by SAD’s culture of maladaptive self-beliefs and the interruption of the normal course of natural motivational development. Positive psychology embraces “a variety of beliefs about yourself, such as the appraisal of your own appearance, beliefs, emotions, and behaviors” (Cherry, 2019). It measures “how much a person values, approves of, appreciates, prizes, or likes him or herself” (Blascovich & Tomaka, 1991). Ritter et al. (2013) conducted a study on the relationship of SAD and self-esteem. The research concluded that SAD persons have significantly lower implicit and explicit self-esteem relative to healthy controls, which manifest in maladaptive self-beliefs of incompetence, unattractiveness, unworthiness, and other irrational self-evaluations.

Healthy philautia is essential for any relationship; it is easy to recognize how the continuous infusion of healthy philautia into a SAD person supports self-positivity and interconnectedness with all aspects of interpersonal love. “One sees in self-love the defining marks of friendship, which one then extends to a man’s friendships with others” (Deigh, 2001).

Self-worth and self-respect improve self-confidence, which allows the individual to overcome fears of criticism and rejection. Risk becomes less potentially consequential, and the playful aspects of ludus are less threatening. Self-assuredness opens the door to traits commonly associated with successful interpersonal connectivity—persistence and persuasiveness, optimism of engagement, and willingness to vulnerability.

A SAD person’s recognition of their inherent value generates the realization that they “are a good person who deserves to be treated with respect” (Ackerman, 2019). The philautia described by Aristotle “is a necessary condition to achieve happiness” (Arreguín, 2009), which, as we continue down the classical Greek path, is eudemonic. “To feel joy and fulfillment at being you is the experience of philautia” (Jericho, 2015). In the words of positive psychologist Stephen (2019), eudaimonia:

describes the notion that living in accordance with one’s daimon, which we take to mean ‘character and virtue,’ leads to the renewed awareness of one’s ‘meaning and purpose in life.’

Aristotle touted the striving for excellence as humanity’s inherent aspiration (Kraut, 2018). He described eudaimonia as “activity in accordance with virtue” (Shields, 2015). Eudaimonia reflects the best activities of which man is capable. The word eudaimonia reflects personal and societal well-being as the chief good for man. “The eudaimonic approach … focuses on meaning and self-realization and defines well-being in terms of the degree to which a person is fully functioning” (Ryan & Deci, 2001). It is through recognition of one’s positive self-qualities and their potential productive contribution to the general welfare that one rediscovers the intrinsic capacity for love.

Let us view this through the symbolism of Socrates’ tale of the Cave (Plato, 1992). In it, we discover SAD persons chained to the wall. Their perspectives are generated from the shadows projected by the unapproachable light outside the cave. They name these maladaptive self-beliefs as useless, incompetent, timid, ineffectual, ugly, insignificant, and stupid.

The prisoners have formed a subordinate dependency on their surroundings and resist any other reality until, one day, they find themselves loosed from their bondage and emerge into the light. Like the cave dwellers, the SAD person breaks away from maladaptive self-beliefs into healthy philautia ’s positive self-qualities, which encourage and support connectivity to all forms of interpersonal love.

A study published in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (Hulme et al., 2012) looked at the effect of positive self-images on self-esteem in the SAD person. Eighty-eight students were screened with the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) and divided between the low self-esteem group and the high self-esteem group. The study had two visions. The first was to study the effect of positive and negative self-appraisal on implicit and explicit self-esteem. The second was to investigate how positive self-beliefs would affect the negative impact of social exclusion on explicit self-esteem and whether high socially anxious participants would benefit as much as low socially anxious participants.

The researchers used a variety of measures and instruments. The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale is standard in SAD therapy and CBT workshops; the Implicit Association Test reveals the strength of the association between two different concepts. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is a ten-item self-report measure of explicit self-esteem, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait (STAI-T) is a 20-item scale that measures trait anxiety, and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) is a self-report scale measuring depression, anxiety, and general distress:

Social exclusion is inherently aversive and reduces explicit self-esteem in healthy individuals … the effect of exclusion has been measured in terms of its impact on positive affect and on four fundamental need scores (self-esteem, control, belonging, and meaningful existence) which contribute to psychological well-being. (Hulme et al., 2012)

The study’s results were consistent with evidence that was based on implicit self-esteem in other disorders; it found that negative self-imagery reduces positive implicit self-esteem in both high and low socially anxious participants. It provided supporting evidence of the effectiveness of promoting positive self-beliefs over negative ones, “because these techniques help patients to access a more positive working self” (Hulme et al., 2012). It also demonstrated that positive self-imagery maintained explicit self-esteem even in the face of social exclusion.

Rechanneling.org | Social Anxiety Workshops With Dr. Robert F. Mullen

Space is Limited
For Information

It is one of the best investments I have made in myself, and I will
continue to improve and benefit from it for the rest of my life.
Nick P.   

Conclusion

For 25 years, since the appearance of SAD in DSM-IV, the cognitive-behavioral approach has reportedly been effective in addressing social anxiety disorder. It is structurally sound and would conceivably remain the foundation for future programs. However, it is not the therapeutic panacea it claims to be. Productive cognitive-behavioral approaches emphasize replacing SAD’s automatic negative thoughts and behaviors (ANTs) with automatic rational ones (ARTs). As defined by UCLA psychologists Hazlett-Stevens and Craske (2002), CBT:

approaches treatment with the assumption that a specific central or core feature is responsible for the observed symptoms and behavior patterns experienced (i.e., lawful relationships exist between this core feature and the maladaptive symptoms that result). Therefore, once the central feature is identified, targeted in treatment, and changed, the resulting maladaptive thoughts, symptoms, and behaviors will also change.

Clinicians and researchers have reported the lack of a precise, diagnostic definition for social anxiety disorder; features overlap and are comorbid with other mental health problems (ADAA, 2019a; Tsitsas & Paschali, 2014). Experts cite substantial discrepancies and disparities in the definition, epidemiology, assessment, and treatment of SAD (Nagata et al., 2015). More specifically, according to a study published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (Alden et al., 2018), “there is not enough attention paid in the literature to the ability to function in the close relationships” required for interpersonal love.

Standard CBT also lacks methodological clarity. Johnsen and Friborg (2015) cite the various forms of CBT used in studies and therapy over the years. Experts point to two predominant types of CBT: “the unadulterated CBT created by Beck and Ellis, which reflects the protocol-driven, highly goal-oriented, more standardized approach they first popularized” and the more integrative and collaborative approaches of “modern” CBT (Wong et al., 2013). This study maintains that neither faction should be ignored if we are to effectively address the complexities of positive self-qualities and their importance to the individual’s psychological well-being.

The deficit of positive self-qualities in individuals impaired by SAD’s symptomatic culture of maladaptive self-appraisal and the interruption of the natural course of human motivational development is a new psychological concept in our evolving conscious complexity. Cognitive-behavioral therapies focus on resolving negative self-imaging through programs of thought and behavior modification.

Positive self-quality in healthy philautia is not a new concept; it was discussed in symposia almost two-and-a-half centuries ago. However, the psychological ramifications and methods to address it are in their formative stages. There is a need for innovative psychological and philosophical research to address the broader implications of healthy philautia’s positive self-qualities, which could deliver the potential for self-love and societal concern to the SAD person, opening the bridge to procuring all forms of interpersonal love.

Kashdan et al. (2011) cite the “evidence that social anxiety is associated with diminished positive experiences, infrequent positive events, an absence of positive inferential biases in social situations, fear responses to overtly positive events, and poor quality of life.” Models of CBT that attempt only to reduce the individual’s avoidance behaviors would benefit from addressing, more specifically, the relational deficits that such people experience, as well as positive psychological measures to counter SAD’s culture of maladaptive self-beliefs. Non-traditional and supported approaches, including those defined as new third-wave (generation) therapies, with CBT serving as the foundational platform for integration, would widen the scope and perspective in comprehending SAD’s evolving intricacies.

One such step is the integration of positive psychology within the cognitive-behavioral therapy model which “despite recent scientific attention to the positive spectrum of psychological functioning and social anxiety/SAD … has yet to be integrated into mainstream accounts of assessment, theory, phenomenology, course, and treatment” (Kashdan et al., 2011). CBT would continue to modify automatic maladaptive self-beliefs, thoughts, and behaviors, and positive psychology would replace them with positive self-qualities.

Training in prosocial behavior and emotional literacy are valuable supplements to typical interventions. Behavioral exercises can be used to practice the execution of considerate and generous social skills. Positive affirmations have enormous subjective value as well. Data provide evidence for mindfulness and acceptance-based interventions, where the goal is not only to respond to the negativity of maladaptive self-beliefs but to pursue positive self-qualities despite unwanted negative thoughts, feelings, images, or memories. Castella et al. (2014) suggest motivational enhancement strategies to help clients overcome their resistance to new ideas and concepts.

Ritter et al. (2013) tout the benefits of positive autobiography to counter SAD’s association with negative experiences, and self-monitoring helps SAD persons recognize and anticipate their maladaptive self-beliefs (Tsitsas & Paschali, 2014). Finally, the importance of considering the “nuanced and unique dynamics inherent in the relationships among emotional expression, intimacy, and overall relationship satisfaction for socially anxious individuals” should be thoroughly considered (Montesi et al., 2013). As positive psychology focuses on the broader spectrum of philautia ’s positive self-qualities, integration with CBT’s behavior modification, neuroscience’s network restructuring, and other non-traditional and supported approaches would establish a working platform for discovery.

Competing Interest Declaration

The author(s) has no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this manuscript.

References

Abel-Hirsch, N. (2010). The life instinct. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 91(5), 1055–1071. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2010.00304.x

CrossRef PubMed

ACBT (Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies). (2019). The world confederation of cognitive and behavioral therapies (WCCBT). Retrieved September 22, 2019, from http://www.abct.org/docs/Members/WCCBT_2019.pdf

Ackerman, C. (2019). What is self-esteem? A psychologist explains. Positive Psychology. Retrieved August 10, 2019, from http://www.positivepsychology.com/self-esteem/

ADAA (Anxiety and Depression Association of America). (2019a). Facts and statistics. Retrieved June 7, 2019, from https://adaa.org/learn-from-us/from-the-experts/blog-posts/consumer/understanding-anxiety-and-depression-lgbtq

ADAA (Anxiety and Depression Association of America). (2019b). What’s normal and what’s not? Retrieved August 12, 2019, from https://adaa.org/understanding-anxiety/obsessive-compulsive-disorder/just-for-teens/whats-normal-whats-not

Ades, T., & Dias, S. (2013). Social anxiety disorder: Recognition, assessment and treatment (NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 159). Retrieved October 17, 2019, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK327649/

Alden, L. E., Buhr, K., Robichaud, M., Trew, J. L., & Plasencia, M. L. (2018). Treatment of social approach processes in adults with social anxiety disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86(6), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000306

CrossRef PubMed

APA (American Psychiatric Association). (2017). Social anxiety disorder. In Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.

Aquinas, T. (1981). St. Thomas Aquinas summa theologica. Thomas More Publishing.

Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean ethics (2nd ed.). Hackett Publishing.

Arreguín, H. Z. (2009). The role of philautia in Aristotle’s ethics. Acta Philosophica, I381–I390. Retrieved August 17, 2019, from http://www.actaphilosophica.it/sites/default/files/pdf/2_2009_arreguin.pdf

Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy. Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Beck, J. S. (2021). Cognitive behavior therapy. Basics and beyond (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1991). Measures of self-esteem. Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. Academic.

Bosche, M. (2019). Social anxiety disorder and social phobia. Anxiety.org. Retrieved from https://anxiety.org/social-anxiety-disorder-sad

Burton, N. (2016). These are the 7 types of love. Psychology Today. Retrieved July 7, 2019, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/hide-and-seek/201606/these-are-the-7-types-love

Capon, A. G., & Blakely, E. J. (2007). Checklist for healthy and sustainable communities. New South Wales Public Health Bulletin, 18, 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1071/nb07066

CrossRef PubMed

Castella, K. D., Goldin, P., Jazaieri, H., Ziv, M., Heimberg, R. G., & Gross, J. L. (2014). Emotion beliefs in social anxiety disorder: Associations with stress, anxiety, and well-being. Australian Journal of Psychology, 66, 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12053

CrossRef

CBT Conferences. (2019). Conference series. Psychology health conference series. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://psychologyhealth.conferenceseries.com/events-list/cognitive-behavioral-therapy

Chapdelaine, A., Carrier, J.-D., Fournier, L., Duhoux, A., & Roberge, P. (2018). Treatment adequacy for social anxiety disorder in primary care patients. PLoS One, 13(11), e0206357. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206357

Cherry, K. (2019). What exactly is self-esteem? Verywellmind. Retrieved September 17, 2019, from https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-self-esteem-2795868

Cuijpers, P., Cristea, L. A., Karyotaki, E., Reijnders, M., & Huibers, M. J. H. (2016). How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence. World Psychiatry, 15, 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20346

CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral

Cuming, P., & Rapee, S. (2010). Social anxiety and self-protective communication style in close relationships. Journal of Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.09.010

CrossRef PubMed

Cuncic, A. (2018). How social anxiety affects dating and intimate relationships. Verywellmind. Retrieved September, 17, 2019, from https://www.verywellmind.com/adaa-survey-results-romantic-relationships-3024769

Darcy, K., Davila, J., & Beck, G. (2005). Is social anxiety associated with both interpersonal avoidance and interpersonal dependence? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-3163-4

CrossRef

David, D., Cristea, I., & Hoffman, S. G. (2018). Why cognitive behavioral therapy is the current gold standard of psychotherapy. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00004

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01

CrossRef

Deigh, J. (2001). The moral self. Pauline Chazan. Mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/110.440.1069.

Desnoyers, A. J., Kocovski, N. L., Fleming, J. E., & Antony, M. M. (2017). Self-focused attention and safety behaviors across group therapies for social anxiety disorder. Anxiety Stress & Coping, 30(4), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2016.1239083

CrossRef

Fatima, M., Naizi, S., & Gayas, S. (2018). Relationship between self-esteem and social anxiety: Role of social connectedness as a mediator. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15(2), 12–17. Retrieved from http://www.gcu.edu.pk/FullTextJour/PJSCS/2017b/2.%20%20Saba%20Ghayas%20(1).pdf

Felman, A. (2018). What’s to know about social anxiety disorder? Medical News Today. Retrieved August 22, 2019, from https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/176891.php

Fialho, M. (2007). “Philanthrôpia” and “Philautia” in Plutarch’s “Theseus”. Hermathena, 182, 71–83. Retrieved from https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.sfpl.org/stable/23041719?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

Gadamer, H.-G. (2009). Friendship and solidarity. Research in Phenomenology, 39, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916408X389604

CrossRef

Gaudiano, B. A., & Herbert, J. D. (2003). Preliminary psychometric evaluation of a new self-efficacy scale and its relationship to treatment outcome in social anxiety disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27(5), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026355004548

CrossRef

Grant, B., Hasin, D., Blanco, C., Stinson, F., Chou, S., & Goldstein, R. B. (2005). The epidemiology of social anxiety disorder in the United States: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66(11), 1351–1361. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v66n1102

CrossRef PubMed

Gregory, B., Wong, Q. J. J., Craig, D., Marker, C. D., & Peters, L. (2018). Maladaptive self-beliefs during cognitive behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder: A test of temporal precedence. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 42(3), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-017-9882-5

CrossRef

Grewal, D. S. (2016). The political theology of laissez-faire: From philia to self-love in commercial society. Political Theology, 17(5), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2016.1211287

CrossRef

Halloran, M., & Kashima, E. (2006). Culture, social identity, and the individual. In Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446211946.n8

CrossRef

Hazlett-Stevens, H., & Craske, M. G. (2002). Brief cognitive-behavioral therapy: Definition and scientific foundations. In F. W. Bond & W. Dryden (Eds.), Handbook of brief cognitive behaviour therapy (pp. 1–20). Wiley.

Heeren, A., & McNally, R. J. (2018). Social anxiety disorder as a densely interconnected network of fear and avoidance for social situations. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 42(6), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9952-3

CrossRef

Helm, B. (2017). Love. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/love/

Heshmat, S. (2014). Social anxiety disorder (SAD). SAD is a risk factor for addiction. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/science-choice/201410/social-anxiety-disorder-sad. Accessed 17 Aug 2019.

Hirsch, C. R., & Clark, D. (2004). Information-processing bias in social phobia. Clinical Psychology Review, 24(7), 799–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.07.005

CrossRef PubMed

Hoffman, S. G., Asnaani, M. A. U., & Hinton, D. E. (2010). Cultural aspects in social anxiety and social anxiety disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 27(12), 1117–1127. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20759

CrossRef

HPD (Histrionic Personality Disorder). (2019). Psychology Today. Retrieved September 12, 2019, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/conditions/histrionic-personality-disorder

Hulme, N., Hirsch, C., & Stopa, L. (2012). Images of the self and self-esteem: Do positive self-images improve self-esteem in social anxiety? Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 41(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2012.664557

CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral

Jazaieri, H., Morrison, A. S., & Gross, J. J. (2015). The role of emotion and emotion regulation in social anxiety disorder current. Psychiatry Reports, 17(1), 531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-014-0531-3

CrossRef

Jericho, L. (2015). Inner spring: Eros, agape, and the six forms of loving. Lilipoh, 20(79), 38–39.

Johnsen, T. J., & Friborg, O. (2015). The effects of cognitive behavioral therapy as an anti-depressive treatment is falling. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 747–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000015

CrossRef PubMed

Kaczkurkin, A. N., & Foa, E. B. (2015). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: An update on the empirical evidence. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 17(3), 337–346.

PubMed PubMedCentral

Kampmann, I. L., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., & Morina, N. (2019). Cognitive predictors of treatment outcome for exposure therapy: Do changes in self-efficacy, self-focused attention, and estimated social costs predict symptom improvement in social anxiety disorder? BMC Psychiatry, 19, 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2054-2

CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral

Kashdan, T. B., Weeks, J. W., & Savostyanova, A. A. (2011). Whether, how, and when social anxiety shapes positive experiences and events: A self-regulatory framework and treatment implications. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 786–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.03.012

CrossRef PubMed

Kraut, R. (2018). Aristotle’s ethics. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved September 27, 2019, from https://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=aristotle-ethics

Lacan, J. (1978). Seminar XI: The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. W.W. Norton.

Lee, R. M., Dean, B. L., & Jung, K. R. (2008). Social connectedness, extraversion, and subjective well-being: Testing a mediation model. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(5), 414–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.017

CrossRef

Lomas, T. (2017). The flavours of love: A cross-cultural lexical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48(1), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12158

CrossRef

Lyford, C. (2017). Is cognitive behavioral therapy as effective as clinicians believe? Despite longstanding authority, new research questions CBT’s reliability. Psychotherapy Networker. Retrieved August 27, 2019, from https://www.psychotherapynetworker.org/blog/details/705/is-cognitive-behavioral-therapy-as-effective-as-clinicians

Manfro, G. G., Heldt, E., Cordiol, A. V., & Otto, M. W. (2008). Cognitive-behavioral therapy in panic disorder. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, 2(8), 1–7. Retrieved from https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1516-44462008000600005andscript=sci_arttextandtlng=en

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346

CrossRef

Mayoclinic. (2017a). Personality disorders. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Retrieved July 25, 2019, from https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/personality-disorders/symptoms-causes/syc-20354463

Mayoclinic. (2017b). Social anxiety disorder (social phobia). Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Retrieved August 13, 2019, from https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/social-anxiety-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20353561

McGinn, L. K. (2019). International associates. Association for behavioral and cognitive therapies. In 53rd Annual Convention. Retrieved September 14, 2019, from http://www.abct.org/Members/?m=mMembers&fa=InternationalAssociates

MHA (Mental Health America). (2019). Social anxiety disorder. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://www.mhanational.org/conditions/social-anxiety-disorder

Montesi, J. L., Conner, G. T., Gordon, E. A., & Fauber, R. L. (2013). On the relationship among social anxiety, intimacy, sexual communication, and sexual satisfaction in young couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9929-3

CrossRef PubMed

Nagata, T., Suzuki, F., & Teo, A. R. (2015). Generalized social anxiety disorder: A still-neglected anxiety disorder 3 decades since Liebowitz’s review. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 69(12), 724–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12327

CrossRef PubMed

NAMI (National Alliance on Mental Illnesses). (2019). Psychotherapy. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://www.nami.org/learn-more/treatment/psychotherapy

Nardi, A. E. (2003). The social and economic burden of social anxiety disorder. BMJ, 327, 1287-a. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.515

CrossRef

NCCMH (National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (UK). (2013). Social anxiety disorder: Recognition, assessment and treatment (NICE clinical guidelines, No. 159). Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK266258/

NIMH (National Institute of Mental Health). (2017). Social anxiety disorder. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/social-anxiety-disorder.shtml

Plato. (1992). The republic. Hackett Publishing.

Read, D. L., Clark, G. I., Rock, A. J., & Coventry, W. L. (2018). Adult attachment and social anxiety: The mediating role of emotion regulation strategies. PLoS One, 13(12), e0207514. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207514

CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral

Reuben, A., & Schaefer, J. (2017). Mental illness is far more common than we knew. Scientific American, 28, 39. Retrieved from https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/mental-illness-is-far-more-common-than-we-knew/

Richards, T. A. (2014). Overcoming social anxiety disorder: Step by step. The Social Anxiety Institute Press.

Richards, T. A. (2019). What is social anxiety disorder? Symptoms, treatment, prevalence, medications, insight, prognosis. The Social Anxiety Institute. Retrieved June 14, 2019, from https://socialphobia.org/social-anxiety-disorder-definition-symptoms-treatment-therapy-medications-insight-prognosis

Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2018). Mental health. Our world in data. Retrieved October 7, 2019, from https://ourworldindata.org/mental-health

Ritter, V., Ertel, C., Beil, K., Steffens, M. C., & Stangier, U. (2013). In the presence of social threat: Implicit and explicit self-esteem in social anxiety disorder. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 37(6), 1101–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-013-9553-0

CrossRef

Rodebaugh, T. L., Lim, M. H., Shumaker, E. A., Levinson, C. A., & Thompson, T. (2015). Social anxiety and friendship quality over time. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 44(6), 502–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2015.1062043

CrossRef PubMed

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141

CrossRef PubMed

Sharma, A. (2014). Self-esteem is the sense of personal worth and competence that persona associate with their self–concepts. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science, 3(6), Ver.4, 16–20.

Shelton, J. (2018). Social anxiety disorder: Symptoms, causes and treatment. Psycom. Retrieved September 7, 2019, from https://www.psycom.net/social-anxiety-disorder-overview

Shields, C. (2015). Aristotle. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. The Metaphysics Research Lab. Retrieved August 23, 2019, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle/

Steele, B. F. (1995). Psychodynamic and biological factors in child maltreatment. In M. E. Helfer, R. S. Kempe, & R. D. Krugman (Eds.), The battered child (5th ed., pp. 73–103). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1192/S000712500015041X

CrossRef

Stein, M. B., & Stein, D. J. (2008). Social anxiety disorder. The Lancet, 371(9618), 1045–1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60488-2

CrossRef

Stephen, J. (2019). What is eudaimonic happiness? How and why positive psychologists are learning from Aristotle. Psychology Today. Retrieved September 12, 2019, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/what-doesnt-kill-us/201901/what-is-eudaimonic-happiness

Topaz, B. (2018). You can stop social anxiety from ruining your relationships. PsychCentral. Retrieved August 27, 2019, from https://psychcentral.com/blog/you-can-stop-social-anxiety-from-ruining-your-relationships/

Tsitsas, G. D., & Paschali, A. A. (2014). A cognitive-behavior therapy applied to a social anxiety disorder and a specific phobia, case study. Health Psychology Research, 2(3), 1603. https://doi.org/10.4081/hpr.2014.1603

CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral

UNLM (U.S. National Library of Medicine). (2018). Personality disorders. Retrieved September 27, 2019, from https://medlineplus.gov/personalitydisorders.html

WebMD. (2019). What is social anxiety disorder? WebMD Medical Reference. Retrieved August 27, 2019, from https://www.webmd.com/anxiety-panic/guide/mental-health-social-anxiety-disorder#1

Whitbourne, S. K. (2018). Is social anxiety getting in the way of your relationships? Psychology Today. Retrieved August 14, 2019, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/fulfillment-any-age/201806/is-social-anxiety-getting-in-the-way-your-relationships

Wong, Q. L. L., Moulds, M., & Rapee, R. M. (2013). Validation of the self-beliefs related to social anxiety scale. Assessment, 21(3), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113485120

CrossRef PubMed

Yeilding, R. (2017). Developing the positive in managing social anxiety. National Social Anxiety Center. Retrieved August 14, 2019, from https://nationalsocialanxietycenter.com/2017/09/18/developing-positive-managing-social-anxiety/

Zimmerman, M., Dalrymple, K., Chelminski, I., Young, D., & Galione, J. H. (2010). Recognition of irrationality of fear and the diagnosis of social anxiety disorder and specific phobia in adults: Implications for criteria revision in DSM-5. Depression and Anxiety, 27(11), 1044–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20716

CrossRef PubMed

Proactive Neuroplasticity YouTube Series

Rechanneling.org | Social Anxiety Workshops With Dr. Robert F. Mullen

WHY IS YOUR SUPPORT SO NECESSARY AND ESSENTIAL?  ReChanneling develops and conducts programs to alleviate the symptoms of social anxiety and help individuals tap into their innate potential for extraordinary living. Our unique approach focuses on understanding personality through empathy and collaboration, integrating neuroscience and psychology. This includes proactive neuroplasticity, cognitive-behavioral modification, positive psychology, and techniques designed to reclaim and rebuild self-esteem. Every contribution, no matter the size, supports individuals striving to make a positive change in their own lives and the lives of others. All donations go towards scholarships for groups and workshops.

INDIVIDUAL RECOVERY. The symptoms of social anxiety make it challenging for some to participate in a collective workshop. Dr. Mullen works one-on-one with a select group of individuals uneasy in a group setting. ReChanneling offers scholarships to accommodate the costs. What is absent in group activities is provided in our monthly Graduate Recovery Group. In this supportive community, graduates interact with others who have completed the program.  Contact ‘rmullenphd@gmail.com’.

Committing to recovery is one of the hardest things you will ever do.
It takes enormous courage and the realization that you are of value, 
consequential, and deserving of happiness.

Defense Mechanisms

Robert F. Mullen, PhD
Director/ReChanneling

For each new subscriber, ReChanneling donates $25 for workshop scholarships.

Defense Mechanisms
AI Generated – Defense Mechanisms

Recent Posts

The distinction between social anxiety and social anxiety disorder is in severity. We are not all affected by the same symptoms or relentlessness. The characteristics and traits are equivalent. These conditions originate homogeneously, their trajectories differentiated by environment, experience, and the diversity of human thought and behavior. While comorbidities dramatically benefit, the recovery methods identified are for social anxiety and social anxiety disorder, and reference to one includes the other.

Defense Mechanisms

Excerpts from our upcoming book, A Tough Love, Common Sense Approach to Recovery from Social Anxiety, currently in final editing.

The overwhelming thoughts and emotions caused by our condition can be challenging for our minds to manage. To cope, we develop defense mechanisms—unconscious strategies meant to protect our emotional health from threats.

We deny, avoid, or compensate for a problem rather than acknowledge it. We rationalize our actions, project them onto others, or displace them by kicking the dog.

When used temporarily, defense mechanisms offer an escape from situations that threaten our fragile self-image. Without these strategies, we can experience decompensation—a state where we cannot effectively handle stress, leading to a breakdown in our ability to function and maintain our mental health.

In simpler terms, decompensation is mental overload, where the stress becomes too much for us to handle, and we struggle with our daily tasks and our mental health.

Defense mechanisms are healthy when used to manage short-term trauma, but become problematic when we rely on them to avoid facing reality. Recovery involves examining and understanding how these strategies support our irrational thoughts and behaviors, helping us avoid conflicts with our fragile self-image.

Recognizing how we use defense mechanisms to bypass or avoid reality is a vital step toward recovery. It enables us to turn defense strategies into tools for growth and healing. It empowers us to take control of our mental well-being and navigate our recovery with confidence.

Psychologists have identified approximately thirty defense mechanisms to date. Eight are especially relevant to social anxiety:

  1. avoidance (e.g., evading thoughts, feelings, or situations that cause anxiety or discomfort),
  2. compensation (e.g., overachieving to hide feelings of inadequacy),
  3. denial (e.g., refusing to acknowledge a problem),
  4. displacement (e.g., taking frustrations out on others),
  5. dissociation (e.g., mentally and emotionally distancing ourselves from unpleasant situations),
  6. projection (e.g., attributing our flaws to others),
  7. rationalization (e.g., justifying uncomfortable or inappropriate feelings or behaviors with seemingly logical explanations),
  8. and the related triad of repression, suppression, and regression.

The thirteen cognitive distortions, also particularly relevant to our social anxiety, are also considered defense mechanisms—patterns of biased or distorted thinking that skew our perception of reality.

This post focuses on eight defense mechanisms germane to social anxiety.

Dr. Mullen is doing impressive work helping the world. He is the
pioneer of proactive neuroplasticity, utilizing DRNI – deliberate,
repetitive, neural information. – WeVoice (Madrid, Málaga)  

Avoidance

A primary SAD symptom is our intense fear or anxiety during social situations, causing us to avoid interacting with others. Human interconnectivity, however, is essential for emotional health. Turning down opportunities to socialize exacerbates our isolation and opportunities for intimacy and friendship.

This does not mean that we need to challenge every situation. There is a clear distinction between avoiding something out of fear and avoiding it for a good reason. Discretion about who and where we engage is essential, as is adhering to our established boundaries and avoiding situations that pose a threat to our physical well-being.

Avoidance can be a reasonable alternative.

Compensation

Compensation is a defense strategy we turn to when we try to excel in one area of our lives to hide perceived flaws in another. It helps us conceal or overcome struggles in one area by becoming skilled at something else. In simple terms, we overachieve in one part of our lives to make up for deficiencies or incapacity in another.

For example, a student might compensate for academic difficulties by excelling in sports or other extracurricular activities. Someone who feels intellectually inferior might become an artisan; a socially awkward person might become a performer; and someone with body dysmorphia may become a fitness enthusiast.

When used wisely, compensation can be a powerful tool for healing. We counteract our perceived flaws with positive, productive traits. We boost our self-esteem by reclaiming our character strengths, virtues, attributes, and achievements. And we replace negative thoughts with positive stimuli.

Overcompensation is common among those of us experiencing social anxiety. In fact, it is often part of our daily struggles. The term refers to an overreaction to feelings of inferiority, incompetence, or inadequacy, leading to overzealous attempts to overwhelm the feelings by striving for perfection or seeking validation from others.


We tend to overcompensate for our perceived shortcomings, going to extremes to make up for imagined deficiencies, and setting unrealistically high expectations we cannot meet.

Perfectionism closely resembles the characteristics of social anxiety. Understanding this connection helps us recognize the role of perfectionism in our condition. Perfectionism isn’t just about wanting to do well; it’s an obsessive need to be flawless, with anything less being unacceptable.

As perfectionists, we harshly criticize ourselves when we fall short of our standards. We worry excessively about our behavior before and during social situations, ruminating on these worries long afterward. When things don’t go as planned, we find it hard to move forward.

Social Anxiety and Perfectionism

Social anxiety and perfectionism are closely linked. Both tend to involve higher anxiety levels and lower psychological well-being.

People with SAD often see situations in extremes. To a perfectionist, anything less than perfect is disastrous. We view others as either supporting us or opposing us. The world appears black-and-white, with no middle ground or room for compromise. We see ourselves as either exceptional or failures.

This mindset fuels cognitive distortions such as the need to be always right, personalization, and polarized thinking.

Perfectionists and those with SAD tend to avoid situations that might lead to disaster, disappointment, or embarrassment. We fear saying or doing the wrong thing. We dread criticism and ridicule. These worries intensify our self-criticism and defensiveness.

Our perfectionism pushes us to set unreasonable expectations, like performing flawlessly, never making mistakes, and being in complete control. When we can’t meet these expectations, we become disappointed and feel even more incompetent and inadequate.

Rechanneling.org | Social Anxiety Recovery Workshops With Dr. Robert F. Mullen

Space is Limited
For Information

It is one of the best investments I have made in myself, and I will
continue to improve and benefit from it for the rest of my life.
Nick P.   

Denial

Denial is a defense strategy that induces us to refuse to accept facts or recognize reality to avoid facing certain truths. It protects us from thoughts and emotions we cannot manage emotionally. It shields us from potentially destructive stimuli by blocking our conscious awareness of the harmful or threatening elements of our memories, experiences, and environment.

We can also be in denial about something we’re not ready to reveal or something that challenges our core beliefs and deeply held convictions.

Denial is a common way to avoid taking responsibility for our behaviors. Many individuals experiencing drug or alcohol addiction deny their habit. Trauma victims often deny that the disturbing experience ever occurred to avoid emotional confrontation. 

While denial can offer temporary respite from things our minds find unmanageable, its persistent use can impede our ability to face our fears and control our lives. Freud called it the ostrich effect because denial is simply burying our problems in the sand.

Individuals denying their social anxiety is a pervasive problem. The inability or unwillingness to accept the personal impact of our condition is patently hostile to recovery. Even worse is the number of individuals who know they are affected but resist recovery. This reticence is rooted in our core beliefs of hopelessness and worthlessness, which preclude us from making the effort.

We must be fully aware (recognize, comprehend, and accept) of our social anxiety to recover from it. Denying it is like Blanche complaining that Baby Jane wouldn’t abuse her if Blanche weren’t confined to a wheelchair. ‘But you are, Blanche! You are in that chair.’

We cannot allow ourselves the luxury of ignorance.

Displacement

Displacement is a defense strategy where we redirect negative or hostile emotions to a less threatening or more acceptable target. Our minds find a safer outlet for triggers that are challenging or dangerous. Displacement allows us to cope with unmanageable feelings by transferring them onto something or someone else.

By displacing negative emotions or distressing experiences, we momentarily alleviate the anxiety associated with the source of distress. In common vernacular, we take our frustrations out on someone else.

Unleashing our unmanageable feelings onto those who pose a limited threat, such as a roommate, sibling, or associate, has obvious repercussions. A chastised worker might go home, shout at his wife, run the lawnmower into the flowerbed, and upend the cat. Each recipient of their displacement is adversely affected.

Examples of displacement include the student, upset about poor grades, who bullies someone on the playground during recess, and the wife, frustrated by her husband’s lack of attention, who seeks another sexual outlet to quash her feelings of rejection.

Another form of displacement is sublimation, where we redirect unacceptable urges into socially acceptable activities, such as the woman who sublimates her self-sabotaging desires by working out at the gym or the man who frequents the local tavern.

Individuals experiencing social anxiety are prone to displacement and sublimation as a relief from their continual self-doubt, isolation, and negative self-appraisal. For example, when we become overwhelmed by unresolved fears at the company convention, we might displace our anger and self-disappointment onto someone we dislike or sublimate them by getting out on the dance floor.

It is crucial to recognize that, like all defense mechanisms, the relief from displacement is temporary. It tells us that we must become more conscious of our emotional processes and the need for more productive coping strategies.

Dissociation

An essential component of our recovery is distancing ourselves from our condition—to step outside the bullseye, as it were. As long as we remain entwined with our social anxiety disorder, we tend to see ourselves as helpless, hopeless, and worthless. These are core beliefs that contribute to our social anxiety and depression, as identified by the pioneer of cognitive-behavioral therapy, Dr. Aaron Beck.

The concept of undesirability, characterized by the feeling of being unwanted or unattractive, is a common manifestation in our workshops, where we discuss and address negative self-appraisal.

Traditionally, dissociation is an unconscious disconnection from reality. It allows individuals to mitigate the effects of trauma by severing specific mental connections. Theoretically, our mind unconsciously blocks memories, emotions, thoughts, and impulses that are hazardous to our emotional well-being.

For instance, a person who has experienced a traumatic event might dissociate themselves from triggers that might rekindle the trauma, effectively ‘shutting off’ the emotions and memories related to the event.

Dissociation can present itself as depersonalization (self-detachment) or derealization (environmental detachment). The broad spectrum of dissociation ranges from listening to music to a total disconnect from reality.

Daydreaming or streaming television to avoid conflict is a harmless form of dissociation, while morphing into multiple personalities is a psychosis called DID (dissociative identity disorder) that requires specialized treatment.

Our first exercise in this book was to begin dissociating ourselves from our social anxiety. We redefine ourselves by our character assets, such as kindness, intelligence, creativity, and resilience, rather than by the symptoms of our condition. We’re not our social anxiety. We are intelligent and resilient individuals experiencing the reparable symptoms of social anxiety.

This shift in self-appraisal enables us to take control of our condition, which significantly weakens it.

Uncoupling ourselves from our condition enables us to objectively analyze our negative thoughts and behaviors, allowing us to respond rationally and productively. By consciously disassociating, we gain the power to deactivate the self-destructive aspects of our condition and activate our strengths, virtues, attributes, and accomplishments. This encourages us to focus on the positive aspects of our character, overriding the negative self-appraisals triggered by our social anxiety.

We are not our social anxiety. When we break a leg, we don’t become the broken limb; we experience the discomfort of a broken bone. The same logic applies to our condition. We are not our symptoms and traits. We are individuals experiencing the distress of a devious and powerful mental health condition. This understanding liberates us from the shackles of our condition, enabling us to thrive.

Projection

Projection is a psychological defense strategy in which we attribute our undesirable thoughts, feelings, impulses, or behaviors to another person or group to avoid confronting and dealing with them.

When we project, we subconsciously deny certain negative character traits but recognize or create them in others. For example, we might project our fears of negative evaluation by ridiculing someone else’s inept attempt at socializing. Or if we carry repressed anger to a company event, we might perceive others as belligerent and aggressive rather than acknowledging our hostility.

Projection acts as a protective shield for our emotional well-being, providing relief from anxiety-provoking thoughts or feelings. By attributing our problems to someone or something else, we create a safe distance from what we find distressing within ourselves.

For instance someone who is dishonest might constantly suspect others of lying, or the bar patron on his fifth scotch, might criticize the obvious inebriation of the person at the other table.

Often, when we instinctively dislike or avoid someone, we unconsciously project our disagreeable traits and impulses onto them. 

Psychological projection occurs when we are unable or unwilling to take responsibility for our fears, anxieties, prejudices, and irrational thoughts and behaviors. It is easier to recognize negative emotions in others than it is to acknowledge them in ourselves.

Like many defense mechanisms, projecting may be healthy in the short term; however, recovery compels us to address the causes of our projection.

The long-term effects of persistent anxiety projection are detrimental to our health and may aggravate traditional symptoms of our social anxiety, including chronic stress, the constant influx of fear- and anxiety-provoking chemical hormones, and decreased or static self-esteem.

Anxiety Projection

Anxiety projection is particularly relevant to our condition. Unconsciously projecting our anxious thoughts, feelings, or impulses onto others or external situations helps us cope with emotions that threaten our emotional stability. Rather than acknowledging our fears or insecurities, we deny them by attributing them to external sources.

The traits that lead to anxiety projection are not uncommon in social anxiety. They include social avoidance, overthinking, perfectionism, porous emotional boundaries, and codependency. Recognizing these traits can help us better understand and manage our condition, knowing that we are not alone in this struggle.

Socially, projected anxiety can create a cycle of misunderstanding and conflict. For instance, a person projecting their insecurities might accuse their partner of being unfaithful without evidence, which can easily lead to relationship conflicts. We tend to avoid companionship and intimacy in anticipation of rejection. Projecting these fears allows us to evade responsibility.

Practical strategies for managing anxiety projection are within our reach. They focus on increasing self-awareness, challenging cognitive distortions, and reframing our fears and self-appraisals. By implementing these strategies, we learn to manage our issues rather than projecting them onto some unsuspecting external source.

Defense Mechanisms
AI Generated

Rationalization

Rationalization is not the same as rational thought or rational coping statements. Which are logical, self-affirming responses to our automatic negative and intrusive thoughts and other irrational and destructive self-appraisals that threaten our emotional well-being.

Rationalization is a defense strategy in which we justify uncomfortable or errant feelings or behaviors with allegedly logical explanations rather than acknowledging the actual reason behind them.

In essence, we deny or distort reality to reduce our emotional discomfort​ and self-disappointment by inventing a plausible excuse to disguise the real explanation for our behavior or feelings. For example, if we are rejected socially, we might say that the person is already in a relationship. If our presentation is substandard, we blame the lighting and tech.

These excuses protect us from self-recrimination and disappointment.

Rationalization allows us to reframe our actions or feelings in a more socially and personally acceptable manner, protecting our self-esteem and avoiding emotions that challenge our self-image. Psychologists consider defense mechanisms like rationalization and projection, unconscious strategies that protect us from threats to our self-esteem​.

Although rationalizations misrepresent our true motivations, they protect us from the feelings of shame, guilt, or anxiety we might experience when we fail to fulfill our true intentions. Rationalization plays a crucial role in maintaining our emotional stability by revising our interpretations of outcomes.

We rationalize our thoughts and behaviors to make them more acceptable, which shields us from negative self-appraisal and helps us maintain a positive self-image. This reassurance is a key function of rationalization.

We rationalize to protect our self-esteem and maintain a positive outlook, and in the short term, this provides comforting relief. It allows us to alleviate stress until we are better equipped to process our motivations.

However, excessive use of rationalization can lead to further problems. Denying, ignoring, or subordinating the truth of a traumatic situation, consciously or unconsciously, prevents us from honestly evaluating our reactions and responses and making positive changes.

Deflecting Responsibility

When we experience anxiety or guilt about our actions, rationalization offers an emotional escape. It replaces discomfort with emotionally acceptable explanations, but it also enables us to evade responsibility for the outcome, a crucial aspect to consider.

An excellent example of rationalization would be the dieter who opts out of the recommended exercises because they are too time-consuming and have failed them in the past —so what’s the point?

Rationalization versus Lying

It’s important to distinguish between rationalization and deception. While lying is a deliberate attempt to mislead, rationalization is a partly or primarily unconscious strategy. Both conceal the truth and disguise our real motives.

Rationalization, in its various forms—such as minimizing, deflecting, blaming, and attacking—is a common human experience. We’ve all been in situations where we downplay the importance of a task, shift blame to others, or make excuses for our actions. It’s a natural defense strategy that prevents us from taking responsibility and shields us from feelings that could challenge our self-esteem.

While it defends against distressing thoughts, erratic behaviors, and failed outcomes, rationalization avoids the deeper problems that require attention.

Repression, Suppression, Regression

Repression operates at the deepest level of our unconscious mind. It’s a process where we unknowingly suppress traumatic memories or thoughts that our minds find too challenging to handle. In psychology, repression refers to the process by which we prevent specific thoughts, memories, or feelings from surfacing into conscious awareness.

While repression may shield us from immediate distress, it’s crucial to understand that it can lead to enduring psychological issues. These memories, buried in our unconscious, subtly shape our thoughts and actions. For instance, a repressed memory of a past failure could breed self-doubt in similar situations, or a buried traumatic event might steer us from specific triggers without our conscious knowledge.

These occurrences can stir up anxiety, stress, and depression, underscoring the profound and potentially long-term implications of repression on our mental health. It’s essential to address these issues to prevent them from developing into enduring psychological problems.

Suppression

Suppression is a voluntary form of repression. It’s a conscious choice to subdue painful thoughts and memories to deal with them at a more appropriate time. This conscious control over our thoughts and emotions is a powerful tool in recovery. It allows us to resolve the issues that we have temporarily suppressed.

The distinction between suppression and dissociation in recovery is also essential to understand. Suppression is a conscious choice to postpone dealing with specific distressing thoughts and behaviors. Dissociation, as used in recovery, is a conscious decision to mentally separate ourselves from the symptoms of our condition to address them dispassionately and objectively.

Understanding these nuances can provide a deeper insight into our psychological processes during recovery. Making us more knowledgeable and better equipped to handle our emotional issues.

Repression is often confused with the defense strategy, denial, in which we refuse to admit to unacceptable thoughts and behaviors, even with evidence to the contrary. Denial involves a conscious refusal to accept the truth. For example, a person in denial about their addiction may refuse to acknowledge their problem despite clear evidence. Repression, on the other hand, involves unconscious mental dismissal. It’s like the mind’s way of protecting us from overwhelming trauma by pushing it out of conscious awareness.

Regression

We also sometimes conflate regression with repression. Regression is reverting to an earlier or less mature stage of psychological development, where we feel safe from emotional conflict. Repression is a psychological attempt to unconsciously forget or block distressing memories, thoughts, or desires.

Both are psychological attempts to unconsciously forget or block distressing memories, thoughts, or desires. However, regression is a severe psychological issue that requires more specialized treatment, something a traditional recovery program does not provide.

A primary objective of a treatment program is to unblock these memories and emotions to address the root causes of our unconscious unwillingness or inability to confront certain distressing or traumatic events or situations.

Certain aspects of our person are broken. It is impossible to fix something that is broken unless we have a clear understanding of its causes. It’s like a novice attempting to rebuild a transmission without knowing the basics of engine operation.

How do we identify the defense strategy we use to avoid dealing with an uncomfortable or unmanageable issue? It’s like recognizing a familiar face in a crowd. You may not be able to explain precisely how you know, but you do. Similarly, we often recognize our defense mechanisms when we see them in action. This underscores the importance of self-awareness in identifying, understanding, and accepting why we use certain defense mechanisms to avoid facing the true nature of our traumatic thoughts and experiences.

This suggests, correctly, that increased self-awareness is necessary to identify, comprehend, and accept our use of defense mechanisms to avoid facing the true nature of our traumatic thoughts and experiences. It’s important to note that during the recovery process, we learn specific coping strategies that help reduce our emotional reliance on defense mechanisms.

Proactive Neuroplasticity YouTube Series

Rechanneling.org | Social Anxiety Recovery Workshops With Dr. Robert F. Mullen

WHY IS YOUR SUPPORT SO NECESSARY AND ESSENTIAL?  ReChanneling develops and conducts programs to alleviate the symptoms of social anxiety and help individuals tap into their innate potential for extraordinary living. Our unique approach focuses on understanding personality through empathy and collaboration, integrating neuroscience and psychology. This includes proactive neuroplasticity, cognitive-behavioral modification, positive psychology, and techniques designed to reclaim and rebuild self-esteem. Every contribution, no matter the size, supports individuals striving to make a positive change in their own lives and the lives of others. All donations go towards scholarships for groups and workshops.

INDIVIDUAL RECOVERY. The symptoms of social anxiety make it challenging for some to participate in a collective workshop. Dr. Mullen works one-on-one with a select group of individuals uneasy in a group setting. ReChanneling offers scholarships to accommodate the costs. What is absent in group activities is provided in our monthly Graduate Recovery Group. In this supportive community, graduates interact with others who have completed the program.  Contact ‘rmullenphd@gmail.com’.

Committing to recovery is one of the hardest things you will ever do.
It takes enormous courage and the realization that you are of value, 
consequential, and deserving of happiness.

Automatic Negative Thoughts: Why We Have Them and How to Alleviate Them

Social Anxiety and Related Conditions

Robert F Mullen, PhD
Director/ReChanneling

For each new subscriber, ReChanneling donates $25 for workshop scholarships.

Identifying and Invalidating Automatic Negative Thoughts
Automatic Negative Thoughts: Why We Have Them and How to Alleviate Them: AI Generated

Recent Posts

Automatic Negative Thoughts: Why We Have Them and How to Alleviate Them

Excerpts from our upcoming book, A Tough Love, Common Sense Approach to Recovery from Social Anxiety, currently in final editing.

Automatic negative thoughts (ANTs) are the immediate, anxiety-provoking thoughts, emotions, memories, and images that occur when we are triggered during daily events and situations. ANTs reflect unpleasant and self-defeating expressions of our negative self-evaluation, affecting how we see ourselves, think others perceive us, and express these insecurities.

The question is, why are automatic negative thoughts so prevalent in social anxiety, and what can we do to alleviate their effect on our emotional well-being?

Our Neural Network

Our neural network, a complex system of interconnected nerve cells, circuits, and pathways, has the remarkable ability to adapt and change. This means we can continuously process information and respond favorably to our experiences, mitigating our self-sabotaging.

Social anxiety traps us in a cycle of fear and anxiety, hindering us from leading a normal life. We avoid opportunities to connect with others and the world around us. We are unduly conscious about how others perceive us and how we express that information.

Over the years, the metabolism of our brain has been inundated with an overabundance of adverse stimuli, but this does not mean we are destined to be trapped in a cycle of anxiety.

Despite its peculiar tendency to make traditional recovery efforts counterproductive, a robust awareness of the symptoms and traits of our condition provides a framework for reversing the lifelong path of emotional damage.

By examining the underlying causes and responding rationally, we can significantly reduce our social anxiety and create a brighter future.

You may be telling yourself all of that is well and good, but how did we get ourselves in this predicament in the first place? The following breaks down social anxiety’s negative trajectory, revealing how it developed into the irrational thoughts and behaviors we demonstrate daily

“Dr. Mullen is doing impressive work helping the world. He is the pioneer of proactive neuroplasticity utilizing DRNI – deliberate, repetitive, neural information.” – WeVoice (Madrid, Málaga)   

The Trajectory of Our Belief System

Our belief system, which is the foundation of our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, shapes how we see and interact with the world. They are broken down into three primary, interactive patterns: core beliefs, intermediate beliefs, and automatic thoughts.

Core Beliefs

Core beliefs are our most deeply held attitudes about ourselves and others, shaped by our childhood caregivers, environment, and experiences. Attitudes are our initial ways of thinking and feeling about someone or something, and how we express those mental and emotional beliefs.

When we decline to question our core beliefs, we accept them as facts, ignoring evidence that contradicts them. Thus, we create or interpret situations that reinforce these beliefs. While deeply rooted and formed early in life, core beliefs are malleable, influenced by our intermediate beliefs. This flexibility of beliefs encourages an open-minded and receptive approach to change, as it means we can challenge and alter our core beliefs with new experiences and evidence.

Intermediate Beliefs

Intermediate beliefs act as a bridge between our core beliefs and automatic thoughts. Unlike core beliefs, they become more flexible through the acquisition of knowledge and awareness generated by further thought, experience, and the senses. Our intermediate beliefs profoundly influence our attitudes, rules, and assumptions.

Our attitudes are how our feelings, beliefs, and actions define our general evaluations of people, things, and concepts. Rules are guidelines or principles we believe must be followed to support our beliefs and actions.

Assumptions are the decisions defined by our rules. We accept these assumptions as accurate, but they are just subjective assessments of life developed by our attitudes, rules, and assumptions.

Our intermediate beliefs are the conduit to our automatic thoughts. Our trajectory from negative core and intermediate beliefs to the manifestation of our social anxiety adversely impacts the thoughts and behaviors we carry with us in social and performance situations.

Automatic Thoughts

As described, automatic thoughts, those quick, involuntary mental or emotional responses to triggers in our environment, are heavily influenced by our intermediate beliefs. These beliefs, which are shaped by our experiences, play a significant role in how we perceive ourselves and the world around us.

Our automatic negative thoughts (ANTs) sustained by our social anxiety define our adverse automatic feelings and emotions.

Emotions are our automatic neurological responses to stimuli, and feelings are our unconscious interpretations of those emotions. It’s crucial to actively recognize and examine the feelings that arise from an emotion. This awareness is a vital part of engaging with our mental processes and understanding the triggers of our automatic negative thoughts.

Understanding the core and intermediate beliefs behind our automatic thoughts is a powerful tool. For instance, if we were often chosen last for high school events, we might develop the intermediate belief that we are unlikable and incapable, rooted in a core belief of insignificance. Conversely, if were are the captain of the popular girls’ volleyball team, our automatic thought might be, ‘I am talented and popular.’

  • Core Beliefs
  • Intermediate Beliefs
  • Automatic Thoughts
Social Anxiety Recovery Workshops With Dr. Robert F. Mullen | Rechanneling.org

Space is Limited
For Information

“It is one of the best investments I have made in myself, and I will
continue to improve and benefit from it for the rest of my life.” – Nick P.

The Trajectory of Our Social Anxiety

Now that we’ve explained the evolution of our belief system, let’s explore the predictable, negative trajectory of our social anxiety. It starts with childhood disturbance.

Childhood Disturbance

We’ve discussed how childhood disturbance interferes with our optimal physical, cognitive, emotional, or social development. Stemming primarily from poor parental rearing (although environment and genetics may play a part), the disturbance fosters core beliefs such as abandonment, neglect, expendability, and inadequacy.

The disturbance may be a one-time occurrence or a series of events. It may be accidental or intentional, real or imagined. It is not the fault of the child, yet it greatly significantly influences our core beliefs, making the two mutually interactive.

  • Core Beliefs
  • Childhood Disturbance
  • Negative Core Beliefs
  • Negative Intermediate Beliefs
  • Automatic Negative Thoughts

SAD Onset

Social anxiety disorder commonly emerges during adolescence, typically around age thirteen, but it can also surface later in life. This delayed onset can sometimes lead individuals to believe they didn’t have social anxiety until their later years. However, the susceptibility to SAD ostensibly begins with childhood disturbance and manifests during early adolescence.

As I recall, I was fearless as an eleven-year-old, visiting the alleys and tenements of Skid Row searching for my father until I found him in a room with a dirty sink and no toilet. My social anxiety seemed to take hold in the summer before high school when I was thirteen, which supports the statistics.

The development of intermediate beliefs extends roughly from childhood through adolescence (roughly ages three through eighteen). Therefore, placing SAD onset between negative core beliefs and negative intermediate beliefs is not fully accurate, but reasonable.

  • Core Beliefs
  • Childhood Disturbance
  • Negative Core Beliefs
  • SAD Onset
  • Negative Intermediate Beliefs
  • Automatic Negative Thoughts

Situations

We understand a situation as a specific set of circumstances, including the facts, conditions, and events that affect us at a particular time and place. Our focus is on fear situations where we anticipate specific anxieties and worries will surface. These can vary widely and include social events, classroom settings, public swimming pools, beauty salons, and other common triggers for anxiety.

Each fear situation is as unique and subjective as the individuals experiencing it. By understanding these fear situations, we can better prepare for them.

Anticipated situations are those we know in advance will trigger our fears and anxieties. They may be one-time events, like a job interview or social gathering, or recurring events, such as a weekly class or everyday work setting.

Unexpected situations can catch us off guard, involving stress-inducing incidents such as a plumbing problem, an unanticipated guest, or losing a wallet.

By distinguishing between these two types of situations, we can better prepare ourselves to handle either scenario. For expected situations, we can strategize ahead of time to address our potential threats. This preparedness is a key tool in managing fear.

For unexpected situations, creating an emergency preparedness kit with practiced coping mechanisms is a practical reassurance.

To identify our expected fear situations, we ask ourselves several questions: Where are we when we feel anxious or fearful? What activities are we doing, and what thoughts might come up? What specific parts of the situation do we perceive as problematic? How do we feel physically, mentally, emotionally, and socially? What worries or concerns challenge us? What’s the worst outcome we believe could happen? What might we imagine could occur? Who or what do we avoid because of these feelings?

The situations that provoke our fears and anxieties obviously precede our automatic negative thoughts, and we have placed them appropriately on our chart.

  • Core Beliefs
  • Childhood Disturbance
  • Negative Core Beliefs
  • SAD Onset
  • Negative Intermediate Beliefs
  • Situation
  • Automatic Negative Thoughts

Triggers

A trigger is a psychological stimulus that evokes distressful feelings or memories and prompts an adverse emotional reaction or behavior. These triggers often originate from past experiences, incidents, observations, memories, images, and the behaviors of others.

It’s essential to acknowledge that even sensory reminders of a disturbance or traumatic event – such as sound, sight, smell, taste, or physical sensation – can trigger reactions, underscoring the profound impact of our past on our present responses.

For example, consider our toddler, Laura, from Chapter One, who developed core beliefs of insignificance and undesirability due to a lack of emotional support from her parents.

Years later, Laura’s difficulty making friends during high school lends credibility to her core and intermediate beliefs. Laura’s negative self-assessment is automatically triggered when a friend rejects her at a social event. She is consumed by automatic negative thoughts about her attractiveness and self-worth.

Automatic Negative Thoughts: Why We Have Them and How to Alleviate Them

It’s important to recognize that automatic negative thinking is a common response to social anxiety and does not indicate personal weakness.

Automatic Negative Thoughts

As we defined at the beginning of this chapter, automatic negative thoughts (ANTs) are the immediate, anxiety-provoking thoughts, emotions, memories, and images that arise when we are triggered during everyday events and situations.

ANTs reflect unpleasant and self-defeating expressions of our negative self-appraisal, influencing how we view ourselves, think others perceive us, and how we express these insecurities.

These thoughts are irrational, self-defeating, and originate from our negative core beliefs, which are sustained by intermediate negative beliefs and our condition.

Fortunately, these self-sabotaging thinking patterns are not set in stone and can be replaced with self-affirming, productive thoughts that we actively develop during recovery, leading to a significant improvement in our emotional well-being.

Solutions

Triggers lead to the activation of our automatic negative thoughts (ANTs). Once we have a basic understanding of these triggers and the ANTs they generate, we can explore solutions.

Coping mechanisms are learned psychological tools and techniques that reduce anxiety and discomfort during stressful situations. These can be traditional or non-traditional methods to counteract our triggers, automatic negative thoughts, and behaviors that harm our emotional well-being.

These can include deep breathing exercises, mindfulness techniques, or even engaging in a favorite hobby. As we progress, we will learn to identify and practice situationally effective coping mechanisms in simulated and real-world conditions.

There are many coping mechanisms to choose from. Some will be personally effective and others will not. Some may work only once or in specific situations. We practice, analyze, and determine which mechanisms prove most subjectively effective, ensuring that each individual’s unique needs are met.

Our automatic negative thoughts are emotional reactions rooted in our negative core and intermediate beliefs, as well as the self-defeating symptoms of our condition. But we are not powerless against these ANTs. Understanding them and challenging them with reason and objectivity enables us to regain control over our thoughts and behaviors, fostering a sense of empowerment and capability.

The three most powerful coping mechanisms include grounding, which is focusing on our physical presence in the present moment to redirect anxiety; reframing, where we consciously and spontaneously choose a positive perspective over negative stimuli; and rational coping statements.

Automatic Negative Thoughts: Why We Have Them and How to Alleviate Them
AI Generated Image

Rational Coping Statements

A rational coping statement is a logical, self-affirming response to automatic negative thoughts, intrusive thoughts, and other irrational or destructive self-assessments that threaten our emotional health. Once again, automatic negative thoughts are the immediate, involuntary, anxiety-provoking statements provoked by the thoughts, emotions, memories, and images that manifest when we are triggered.

For example, if we fear being criticized in a social setting, our intermediate thoughts might include, ‘I will be rejected,’ or ‘No one will talk to me.’ When triggered, these fears generate automatic negative thoughts, such as ‘I don’t belong here’ and ‘I am unwelcome.’

Remember, ANTs can be triggered by thoughts, emotions, memories, images, and sensory recall, but they stem from our core beliefs—like abandonment or detachment—that are reinforced by our negative intermediate beliefs.

It is crucial to recognize that our ANTs are not based on facts but on assumptions. An assumption is something we believe is true or likely to happen, but we have no proof (unless we’re mind readers or fortune tellers). Recognizing this can bring relief, as it reminds us that assumptions are generally inaccurate.

The ANTs, ‘I don’t belong here’ and ‘I am unwelcome’ are assumptions. We can effectively fight these assumptions by responding with rational coping statements. These statements, such as ‘I have every right to be here,’ or ‘I am deserving of acceptance and belonging,’ Are not just words. They are powerful tools that affirm our worth and dispel false beliefs, putting us back in control of our thoughts and emotions.

Remember, our anxieties are not real. They feel real but are intangible. Anxiety is an abstract idea; it has no power of its own. We create and nurture it, giving it strength and influence. This understanding puts us in the driver’s seat, reminding us that we are in control; anxiety is just a false projection that we can dismiss. It is a subjective, illogical projection, and we have the power to change it.

Devising Rational Coping Statements

First, we identify the situations that trigger our fears. Where do we feel anxious or scared? What activities are we involved in? What thoughts come up? Is it a networking event, speaking in front of a class, a social outing, a family dinner, or being in a public swimming pool? Everyone is different.

Next, we unpack the fears or anxieties associated with the situational triggers. What exactly is problematic? How do we feel physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually? What worries do we have? What’s the worst that could happen? What do we imagine might occur? Who or what do we avoid because of these feelings? What is being said or inferred?

From there, we unmask our corresponding ANTs. What negative messages do we tell ourselves when triggered? How do we express them? What involuntary emotional images or expressions do we experience? How do we negatively view ourselves during these moments?

Remember, our automatic negative thoughts are the immediate, involuntary, anxiety-provoking statements provoked by the thoughts, emotions, memories, and images that manifest when we are triggered. Statements such as ‘No one will talk to me,’ ‘I am unattractive,’ or ‘I will say something stupid.’

After thoroughly examining and analyzing our fear situations, triggers, associated fears, and corresponding ANTs, we generate rational coping statements.  We know our fears and ANTs are irrational reflections of our negative self-appraisal. By examining and analyzing the reasons behind them, we view them in the context of the situation. Are they practical? Are they real or false assumptions? How would a confident, self-assured individual respond to them?

With this information, we devise rational coping statements to counteract or alleviate our ANTs.

Eventually, we will expose ourselves to our fear situations by confronting our associated anxieties and corresponding ANTs in real life. This exposure occurs after a suitable period of graded exposure – usually in a workshop or therapeutic environment – which involves gradually increasing the intensity of the fear situation to establish a comfort zone and familiarity with the prescribed tools and techniques.

Steps to Devising Rational Coping Statements

  1. Identify Our Fear Situation
  2. Unpack Our Associated Fear(s)
  3. Unmask Our Corresponding ANT(s)
  4. Analyze Our Associated Fear(s) and Corresponding ANT(s)
  5. Generate Rational Coping Statements

Intrusive Thoughts

Not all thoughts are caused by specific situations or unexpected events. Intrusive thoughts are unpleasant thoughts, memories, or images that suddenly come into our minds without any clear reason. They tend to be strange, disturbing, repetitive, and difficult to dismiss.

While they can be linked to stressful situations, we differentiate intrusive thoughts from automatic negative thoughts, which are responses to specific situations, because intrusive thoughts appear out of nowhere, usually without identifiable triggers.

It’s important to remember that intrusive thoughts are common. They often produce disturbing and offensive images, such as violence, sexual explicitness, or socially inappropriate behavior. These are not reflections of our true selves, but rather dark fantasies that most of us have entertained at some point.

Some common examples of intrusive thoughts include thoughts of suddenly swerving your car into a crowd of people. Or tossing a brick through a store window at a rude salesclerk. Maybe we fantasize about shoplifting to see if we can get away with it. Or cheating on our significant other who has been dismissive.

It’s normal to experience intermittent intrusive thoughts. However, some can be especially difficult to manage. These might be repetitive thoughts that keep us awake at night. Or violent images that we can’t seem to shake off.

The unwanted and unexpected nature of intrusive thoughts sets them apart from other thoughts, worries, ruminations, or desires. These disturbing thoughts are often so opposite to our character and wishes that they can cause distress or disgust when we have them.

Other Negative Influences on Our Thinking

People experiencing social anxiety often cling to information that confirms their negative self-view while ignoring evidence that contradicts those beliefs. This behavior leads to cognitive biases—unconscious errors in thinking that distort how we perceive information, ultimately affecting the accuracy of our perceptions and decisions.

Adding to this problem is our inherent negativity bias. Humans are biologically predisposed to notice, react to, and remember negative stimuli more easily than positive ones. This tendency can worsen the symptoms of our condition.

We often expect the worst-case scenarios, anticipate criticism, fear ridicule and rejection, worry about embarrassing ourselves, and imagine undesirable outcomes. This pattern can create self-fulfilling prophecies, supported by behaviors that turn our negative predictions into reality.

Proactive Neuroplasticity YouTube Series

Rechanneling.org | Recovery From Social Anxiety With Dr. Robert F. Mullen

WHY IS YOUR SUPPORT SO NECESSARY AND ESSENTIAL?  ReChanneling develops and implements programs to (1) mitigate symptoms of social anxiety and related conditions and (2) pursue personal goals and objectives – harnessing our intrinsic aptitude for extraordinary living. Our paradigmatic approach targets the personality through empathy, collaboration, and program integration utilizing neuroscience and psychology, including proactive neuroplasticity, cognitive-behavioral modification, positive psychology, and techniques designed to regenerate self-esteem. All donations support scholarships for groups and workshops.  

INDIVIDUAL RECOVERY. The symptoms of social anxiety make it challenging for some to participate in a collective workshop. Dr. Mullen works one-on-one with a select group of individuals uneasy in a group setting. ReChanneling offers scholarships to accommodate the costs. What is missed in group activities is provided in our monthly, no-cost Graduate Recovery Group. In this supportive community, graduates interact with others who have completed the program.  Contact ‘rmullenphd@gmail.com’.

Committing to recovery is one of the hardest things you will ever do.
It takes enormous courage and the realization that you are of value,
consequential, and deserving of happiness.

The Science Behind Positive Personal Affirmations

Recovery from Social Anxiety and Related Conditions

Robert F Mullen
Director/ReChanneling

For each new subscriber, ReChanneling donates $25 for workshop scholarships.

The Science Behind Positive Personal Affirmations
The Science Behind Positive Personal Affirmations (AI Generated)

Recent Posts

Positive Personal Affirmations

Excerpts from our upcoming book, A Tough Love, Common Sense Approach to Recovery from Social Anxiety, currently in final editing.

The positive thinker sees the invisible,
feels the intangible, and achieves the impossible.

Winston Churchill

This chapter is dedicated to our second recovery objective: to produce rapid, concentrated positive stimulation that offsets the abundance of negative information in our brain’s metabolism. One of the most potent yet often overlooked methods to achieve this transformation is through the use of positive personal affirmations (PPAs). These affirmations have the power to bring about significant and positive changes in our mental landscape.

Our Resistance

Our underestimation of the power of PPAs is largely due to a lack of understanding of the science behind them. Many clients are deterred by misconceptions and new-age associations, which can be overcome by a deeper understanding of the psychological and neurological principles at play.

Positive personal affirmations are self-actualizing tools that counter our negative thoughts and self-appraisals, stimulating the brain regions involved in emotional processing and realignment. PPAs help us focus on goals, challenge negative, self-defeating beliefs, and reprogram our subconscious mind.

PPAs are self-affirming statements that we repeat to ourselves to describe what and who we want to be.

While most refer to PPAs as simply ‘personal affirmations,’ the emphasis on positive helps counter social anxiety’s predictable negative trajectory and adverse self-appraisal.

While the practice of PPAs may seem deceptively simple, our social anxiety often leads us to question even the most reasonable concepts. However, it’s important to remember that the efficacy of PPAs is not determined by their complexity, but by their consistent application.

Opposing new ideas is a natural physiological reaction. Our brain’s inertia senses and repels change, and our basal ganglia resist modifying our behavior patterns. Thus, habits like smoking or gambling are hard to break, and new undertakings like recovery or a new diet are challenging to maintain.

Additionally, we all have a negativity bias that encourages distrust and favors inaction. Like most humans, we are cognitively more receptive to adverse events than to positive ones.

It’s crucial to understand that the effectiveness of PPAs is not just a matter of belief or opinion. It is backed by scientific research, providing concrete evidence of their validity and potential to bring about positive change.

“Dr. Mullen is doing impressive work helping the world. He is the pioneer of proactive neuroplasticity utilizing DRNI – deliberate, repetitive, neural information.” – WeVoice (Madrid, Málaga)         

The Science

Our neural network is a biological system of interconnected brain neurons that screens data. Our brain’s metabolism involves the complex chemical and electrical processes that influence and alter our neural circuitry. Positive neurological stimulation changes the polarity of our neural network from toxic to healthy.

Every human brain has roughly 200 billion neurons that relay electrical signals. Neural stimuli are sensory, i.e., sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch. They are mental in the forms of memory, intellect, and intuition; physical in our somatic and physiological reactions; and emotional through images, words, experiences, and so on. 

Proactive neuroplasticity helps reshape our neural network. By inputting short, self-affirming, and self-motivating statements as positive, personal affirmations, we influence our brain’s circuitry. The deliberate repetitive neural input (DRNI) of information not only restructures our neural network but also fosters new mindsets and abilities.

Neuroplasticity is not just a theoretical idea but a scientifically proven tool for changing our thoughts and actions. We accelerate and enhance learning (and unlearning) by intentionally guiding our brains to rewire their neural pathways. This process enables us to replace unhelpful motivations and maladaptive behaviors with more productive ones. 

Repeating self-motivating statements produces all the benefits of proactive neuroplasticity, including long-term potentiation, increased nerve impulse strength along connecting axons, higher levels of BDNF, and abundant positive neural reciprocation.

Additionally, PPAs decrease the influx of our fear and anxiety-provoking hormones while triggering the release of hormones that produce cognitive viability and productivity.

Information Must Register

Neural information is registered stimuli, i.e., detected (noticed) and recorded. Most stimuli do not register. They are nugatory. Registered information can be positive, negative, or neutral.

When we register information, it activates receptor neurons, which in turn stimulate presynaptic neurons. These neurons then relay the information to postsynaptic neurons, triggering a neural chain reaction involving billions of connected neurons.

The Science Behind Positive Personal Affirmations

Every receipt of registered information engages a receptor neuron to fire. Each firing reshapes and strengthens the axon connections—the pathways neurons use to communicate. The more often they fire, the more neurons are affected, leading to multiple connections between receptor, sensory, and relay neurons, which in turn attract additional neurons.

Powered by repetition, this process accelerates learning by causing neural circuits to intricately form connections, reinforcing and consolidating the neural pathways responsible for processing information. It highlights our ability to shape our learning, productivity, and growth.

Accentuating the Positive

Neurons don’t act by themselves but through circuits that strengthen or weaken their connections based on electrical activity. When multiple neurons wire together, they heighten the activity of the axon pathway. Synaptic connections strengthen when two or more neurons are activated simultaneously.

The repeated and consistent stimulation of postsynaptic (relay) cells, which are the cells that receive signals from the presynaptic cells, increases learning efficiency. As neurons multiply, they amplify the energy carried by information. Energy refers to the size, amount, or degree of transfer during this process.

Neural circuits operate like muscles. The more repetitions, the stronger the connections. Repeated firings enhance and solidify the pathways between neurons, increasing the activity along the axon pathways.

By consciously choosing to input new information, we not only prompt our neural network to restructure but also strengthen and realign neural circuits. This confirms our significant role in shaping our emotional well-being and quality of life by proactively controlling the content of the information we input.

When multiple neurons fire repeatedly, they activate ‘long-term potentiation’, a scientific term that simply means the strengthening of connections between neurons over time. This process leads to higher levels of a protein called brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which supports the survival and growth of healthy neurons.

Constructing Our Information

Driven by our intentions and the content of our information, this process enables us to determine the viability of the information.

To reiterate, our brain only registers information that it detects or notices. Most signals or stimuli we encounter are insignificant, meaning we do not detect them. If our brain does not register information, our receptor neurons remain unstimulated, and the information is inviable.

Changing our habits, removing ourselves from hostile environments, and breaking patterns that hinder our optimal functioning can be difficult. Our deliberate, repetitive neural input (DRNI) of information refers to the intentional and consistent exposure to specific types of information that empowers us to take responsibility for our emotional well-being and quality of life by proactively controlling the content of the information we input.

Since our conscious brain ostensibly processes about 10 bits of data per second of the two billion bits that surround our sensory systems, inputting carefully crafted and relevant information to ensure its noticeability is crucial.  

The Most Effective PPAs

The best PPAs are deliberate and tailored to our objectives. Are we confronting the negative thoughts and behaviors associated with our social anxiety? Are we reinforcing the character strengths and virtues that bolster recovery and transformation? And are we concentrating on a specific challenge? What is our ultimate aim, i.e., the personal milestone we aspire to reach? These are the questions that guide the creation of effective PPAs. 

By setting clear, specific goals, we significantly enhance the quality of information that supports our desired outcomes. Each deliberate neural input alerts millions of neurons, accelerating and consolidating neural restructuring to offset the abundance of negative information in our brain’s metabolism. This focus on clear goals keeps us on track and enhances our progress.

How can affirmative statements or activities counteract years of negative self-assessment? The transformative power of PPAs is immeasurable. We witness the abundant positive neural reciprocation. We observe the increased activity in the self-processing systems of the cortex. We’re aware of the other scientific benefits of proactive neuroplasticity. We know it works because we see and experience the transformation.

Social Anxiety Recovery Workshops With Dr. Robert F. Mullen | Rechanneling.org

Space is Limited
For Information

“It is one of the best investments I have made in myself, and I will
continue to improve and benefit from it for the rest of my life.” – Nick P.

Criteria

The most authentic and compelling PPAs are constructed using the following seven criteria. 

Rational: A primary objective in recovery is to challenge our negative self-appraisals, which arise from core and intermediate beliefs shaped by childhood experiences and our current condition. These beliefs often manifest as automatic negative thoughts (ANTs) that are generally illogical and self-destructive. To counter them, we need to devise a rational response. For instance, if our ANT reflects a fear of ridicule related to social anxiety disorder (SAD), a possible rebuttal could be an affirmation that our opinions and contributions are as valuable as anyone else’s. This rational response enables us to take control of our thoughts and beliefs.

Reasonable: Being sensible in setting achievable expectations is a key to success. Unreasonable means we lack reason, a characteristic of insanity. We can either exercise sound judgment or be misled by cognitive biases. Rejecting our groundless thoughts and behaviors through reasonable and sound responses is necessary. For example, claiming, ‘I will publish my first novel,’ is unreasonable if we choose to remain illiterate. Setting reasonable and achievable expectations creates more realistic and manageable paths to success.

Unconditional: Our commitment to the content of our affirmations must be unwavering. Placing limitations on our commitment by using words like ‘maybe’ and ‘ might’ weakens our resolve. ‘Maybe I will start my diet’ is not a firm commitment. Conditional undertakings originate in doubt and manifest in avoidance. Qualifying or conditional words or statements provide an excuse to procrastinate, obfuscate, and justify our failures. (‘I might have won if only …’) 

Positive. When crafting our affirmations, we must avoid negative words. Instead of saying, ‘I will not be afraid,’ a more empowering statement could be, ‘I will be courageous.’ The use of positive language has the remarkable ability to uplift our spirits and foster an optimistic outlook.

Goal-focused: Knowing our destination is essential; otherwise, our path will be unfocused and aimless. The content of our information should concentrate on alleviating our deficits by recognizing our assets. If we avoid confrontation, an effective PPA would be ‘I will challenge my fears.’

First-Person Present or Future Tense: Recovery is a here-and-now process. Although it leaves its fingerprints on the future, the past is immutable. We have no control over it beyond our response to it. Recovery focuses on the present and its impact on the future.

Our affirmations should be timely and self-affirming, such as ‘I am viable,’ and ‘I have the willpower to succeed.’ Future-oriented affirmations, like ‘I will succeed,’ are equally effective.

Concise: Brief and clearly expressed PPAs are potent and effective. Additionally, they are easily memorized, which is essential as our PPAs evolve and adapt to the momentum of our recovery.

The ongoing self-appraisal of PPAs helps us focus on our goals, challenge negative, self-defeating beliefs, and reprogram our subconscious minds. Over time, we can replace or overwhelm our negative thoughts and behaviors with healthy, productive ones. PPAs rebuild self-esteem and empower us by teaching us to be more mindful of our character strengths, virtues, and attributes.

Repetition Ennui

Repeating PPAs is not a complex operation, but a manageable and straightforward process.

Notwithstanding, I have yet to work with a client who enjoys the daily repetitive process any more than the recalcitrant teenager likes cleaning their room. Many clients cite the weariness and boredom of repetition as their excuse for their laxness in practicing their PPAs.

Learning is dependent on repetition. It strengthens neural connectivity by consolidating our neural pathways. Long-term potentiation enhances receptivity and memory, as do the neurotransmissions of productive chemical hormones. This underscores the importance of regular PPA practice for significant mental health benefits.

The recommended process is to repeat aloud three self-motivating statements five times, three times a day (or all at once if you prefer), generating forty-five cellular chain reactions. The practice takes three to five minutes out of our day.

Repeating the same mantras multiple times daily may seem mind-numbing and frustrating. Nevertheless, it is a small investment of time for significant mental health benefits.

Many experts recommend we repeat our PPAs in front of a mirror. However, social anxiety generates irrational perceptions of unattractiveness and undesirability, which can devalue the mirror routine, so we perform our PPAs as a verbal/mental exercise. 

Each positive neural input impacts millions of neurons as they restructure your neural network to a form conducive to a positive self-image. It decreases the fear and anxiety hormones, including cortisol, adrenaline, and norepinephrine, as our brain transmits GABA for relaxation, dopamine for pleasure and motivation, endorphins for euphoria, serotonin for a sense of well-being, acetylcholine to facilitate learning, glutamate that supports memory, and noradrenaline for concentration.

The Power of Suggestion

In addition to the benefits of PPAs already enumerated, there is the power of suggestion, a potent force that triggers positive changes in our thoughts and behaviors. This power is deeply rooted in psychology and is attributed to our ‘response expectancies,’ or anticipations of a positive response. These expectations, which we often overlook, play a significant role in the power of suggestion, shaping our reactions and behaviors.

Think of PPAs as transformative tools, like self-fulfilling prophecies, that have the power to restructure our neural network. By intentionally repeating PPAs, we can harness focused neural stimulation to counteract the current abundance of negative information in our brain’s metabolism.

Proactive Neuroplasticity YouTube Series

Social Anxiety Recovery Workshops By Dr. Robert F. Mullen | ReChanneling.org

WHY IS YOUR SUPPORT SO NECESSARY AND ESSENTIAL?  ReChanneling develops and implements programs to (1) mitigate symptoms of social anxiety and related conditions and (2) pursue personal goals and objectives – harnessing our intrinsic aptitude for extraordinary living. Our paradigmatic approach targets the personality through empathy, collaboration, and program integration utilizing neuroscience and psychology including proactive neuroplasticity, cognitive-behavioral modification, positive psychology, and techniques designed to regenerate self-esteem. All donations support scholarships for groups and workshops.   

INDIVIDUAL RECOVERY. The symptoms of social anxiety make it challenging for some to participate in a collective workshop. Dr. Mullen works one-on-one with a select group of individuals uneasy in a group setting. ReChanneling offers scholarships to accommodate the costs. What is absent in group activities is provided in our monthly, no-cost Graduate Recovery Group. In this supportive community, graduates interact with others who have completed the program.  Contact ‘rmullenphd@gmail.com’.

Committing to recovery is one of the hardest things you will ever do.
It takes enormous courage and the realization that you are of value,
consequential, and deserving of happiness.

Cognitive Reframing our Social Anxiety

Recovery from Social Anxiety and Related Conditions

Robert F. Mullen, PhD
Director/ReChanneling

For each new subscriber, ReChanneling donates $25 for workshop scholarships.

Cognitive Reframing our Social Anxiety
Cognitive Reframing for Social Anxiety

Recent Posts

The distinction between social anxiety and social anxiety disorder is in severity. We are not all affected by the same symptoms or relentlessness. The characteristics and traits are equivalent. These conditions originate homogeneously, their trajectories differentiated by environment, experience, and the diversity of human thought and behavior. While comorbidities dramatically benefit, the recovery methods identified are for social anxiety and social anxiety disorder, and reference to one includes the other.

Cognitive Reframing Our Social Anxiety

Coping Mechanism

Coping mechanisms are tools that enable us to manage our emotions, alleviate anxiety, and navigate stress. They encompass a wide range of strategies, from learned skills like distractions and visualization to natural responses such as hiking or listening to music.

Cognitive Reframing

A core coping mechanism is cognitive reframing, a CBT tool that helps us identify, challenge, and replace negative or distorted thought patterns with healthier, more life-affirming perspectives. This technique is instrumental in developing a more positive view of ourselves, others, and the world, thereby reducing symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stress.

For instance, if a social event sparks feelings of inadequacy, we reframe it as an opportunity to enhance our social skills, thereby boosting our confidence and self-esteem.

When we recognize our inherent capacity to choose joy and positivity over despondency and self-pity, it becomes the logical and liberating option for emotional well-being.

Positive reframing induces us to transform a negative situation into a positive one. We identify our adversarial circumstance and determine how we choose to experience, react, and respond to it.

Every Situation Offers Multiple Perspectives

Every situation can be perceived through multiple perspectives. While we cannot control everything that happens, we always have the power to choose how we wish to react and respond. Recognizing this power of choice in managing our emotional well-being is crucial to recovery. If we have the option to choose serenity over anxiety, it is illogical not to seize that opportunity.

We reframe a problem or issue as a challenge or opportunity. We defuse an argument by considering the other person’s perspective. During a snowstorm, we can feel trapped and despondent, or we can take out the sleds and ice skates and enjoy the day. Experts agree that reframing is crucial for mental and emotional health.

While it may appear to be a straightforward solution to our self-destructive thoughts and activities, overcoming negative thinking is challenging for someone experiencing social anxiety. Childhood disturbance, negative core and intermediate beliefs, and adverse self-appraisal have rooted themselves in our minds like squatters resisting eviction.

Moreover, because of our condition, we are unduly influenced by discomforting input from external sources, including cynical and false media, adverse public opinion, stigma, and clinical disinformation.

While positive reframing becomes automatic at some point in our recovery journey, learning the necessary skills for effective coping takes time, but practice, repetition, and deliberation accelerate and consolidate the process.

Multiple Strategies

Reframing is not just an abstract commitment to changing every negative thought or situation into a positive one. Multiple strategies support our resolution to approach the negativity of our condition with favorable perspectives.

Through these strategies, we create a more nuanced and balanced perspective that encourages positivity, growth, and resilience. By practicing emotional self-regulation, which involves recognizing and managing our emotions appropriately, we reduce the frequency and severity of recurring negative perspectives and self-appraisal.

In recovery, we don’t resist our fears; we embrace them. Rather than confronting them, which implies hostility, or challenging them, which signals competition, we recognize and accept all facets of our humanness as a part of resolving our issues.

Whether in pre-recovery, where our fears and anxieties run rampant, or in recovery, where we establish governance, our experiences are part of our being—who we were, who we are, and who we have the potential to be. Reframing negative experiences is not just about control; it’s about instilling hope and fostering transformation. It’s about seeing the potential for growth and change in every experience.

Embracing is not acquiescence, resignation, or condoning. Acquiescence is accepting our condition and doing nothing to change it. Condoning is accepting it even though we know it’s detrimental. Resignation is defeatism.

Embracing our condition is accepting who we are –  human beings with character strengths, virtues, attributes, shortcomings, and vulnerabilities. It’s about acknowledging our condition and working towards positive change, rather than allowing it to define us. We embrace our totality, recognizing that our condition is just one aspect of our complex and unique selves.

Social anxiety disorder is ostensibly the most underrated, misunderstood, and misdiagnosed disorder. It sustains itself by compelling irrational thoughts and behaviors. Emotionally, we feel depressed and lonely. Physically, we are subject to trembling, hyperventilation, nausea, fainting, and muscle spasms. Mentally, our thoughts are distorted and illogical. Spiritually, we define ourselves as useless and insignificant.

Because of shame and guilt, we see ourselves as failures. While we remain governed by our social anxiety disorder, we wallow in the cognitive quartet of helplessness, hopelessness, undesirability, and worthlessness.

Since SAD generally onsets during adolescence, many of us have endured the distress of these negative self-perceptions for decades. Estimates reflect that the majority of us also have depression and are prone to substance abuse.  Recovering from social anxiety is a commitment that SAD will do anything to prevent us from making.

Dr. Mullen is doing impressive work helping the world. He is the
pioneer of proactive neuroplasticity, utilizing DRNI – deliberate,
repetitive, neural information. – WeVoice (Madrid, Málaga)   

Recovery Goal and Objectives

The primary goal of recovery from social anxiety is the moderation of our irrational fears and anxieties. We achieve this process through a three-pronged approach. To:

  1. Replace or overwhelm our negative thoughts and behaviors with healthy, productive ones.
  2. Produce rapid, concentrated positive stimulation to offset the abundance of negative information in our brain’s metabolism.
  3. Regenerate our self-esteem through positive reinforcement and mindfulness of our assets, utilizing methods targeted toward our individuality.

Each activity in the recovery process is a catalyst for transformation – a rigorous and dramatic change in form and nature. Through proactive neuroplasticity, our neural network changes its form and configuration. Thought and behavior self-modification subverts the destructive nature of our negative self-beliefs. Mindfulness of our character strengths, virtues, and attributes regenerates our self-esteem. Hence, our form and nature have changed.

The Metamorphosis of Recovery

The difference between pre-recovery, when we are overwhelmed by our negative beliefs, and in-recovery, whenwe transform our form and nature, is profound. This metamorphosis is evidence of the power of transformation. We are not the same entity.

Mindfulness of our assets compels us to recognize and embrace the extraordinariness of our lives, self-confirming that we are of value, desirable, and consequential.

There is no absolute cure for social anxiety disorder, but recovery dramatically alleviates its symptoms. Reframing them doesn’t erase our past, memories, or experiences; it enhances them with a new positive perspective. Candid self-awareness, a cornerstone of self-esteem, is crucial. If we can’t understand ourselves, flaws and all, we can’t fully understand others.

Benefits of Recovery

As a behaviorist and expert in recovery, I differentiate the millions of people experiencing social anxiety into two distinct groups: static and dynamic. Static SAD individuals are inactive – stuck in their unhappy condition, unable or unwilling to break the bond of emotional malcontent.

On the other hand, dynamic SAD persons are engaged in constant change, activity, and progress, actively seeking ways to manage their social anxiety and improve their lives.

This contrast between the two states, the dynamic and the static, becomes evident as we break free from the cycle of fear and avoidance of social situations. Being a dynamic SAD individual means taking control of our emotional well-being and quality of life by actively seeking ways to manage our social anxiety.

Rechanneling.org | Recovery From Social Anxiety Workshops Online | Dr. Robert F. Mullen

Space is Limited
For Information

It is one of the best investments I have made in myself, and I will
continue to improve and benefit from it for the rest of my life.
Nick P.   

Characteristics of a Dynamic SAD Person

We lose our sense of hopelessness with a renewed optimism, embracing possibility over inconceivability. We subvert our core sense of helplessness by reanimating our self-reliance and resilience. Our confidence makes us approachable, which mitigates any irrational sense of undesirability.

We rediscover our worth.

This renewed self-awareness, an essential aspect of recovery, opens us to new relationships and opportunities, fostering a more compassionate perspective. This shift in awareness is a powerful tool in our recovery, helping us navigate social situations with greater ease and understanding.

We are curious and adventurous because we are embarking on a journey of discovery. We open our minds to new concepts and tools that guide us through recovery. And we become flexible and adaptable because those are the qualities of someone who fearlessly challenges what lies ahead.

We are creative thinkers because we are now problem solvers. We are risk-takers, ready and willing to do what it takes to heal. And we are energetic and enthusiastic about the change we perceive on the horizon.

A dynamic SAD person is self-empowered to overcome the obstacles that recovery will thrust upon us. We are passionate about transforming our lives.

Proactive Neuroplasticity YouTube Series

WHY IS YOUR SUPPORT SO NECESSARY AND ESSENTIAL?  ReChanneling develops and conducts programs to alleviate the symptoms of social anxiety and help individuals tap into their innate potential for extraordinary living. Our unique approach focuses on understanding personality through empathy and collaboration, integrating neuroscience and psychology. This includes proactive neuroplasticity, cognitive-behavioral modification, positive psychology, and techniques designed to reclaim and rebuild self-esteem. Every contribution, no matter the size, supports individuals striving to make a positive change in their own lives and the lives of others. All donations go towards scholarships for groups and workshops.

INDIVIDUAL RECOVERY. The symptoms of social anxiety make it challenging for some to participate in a collective workshop. Dr. Mullen works one-on-one with a select group of individuals uneasy in a group setting. ReChanneling offers scholarships to accommodate the costs. What is absent in group activities is provided in our monthly Graduate Recovery Group. In this supportive community, graduates interact with others who have completed the program.  Contact ‘rmullenphd@gmail.com’.

Committing to recovery is one of the hardest things you will ever do.
It takes enormous courage and the realization that you are of value, 
consequential, and deserving of happiness.

How Can We Offset Negative Neural Information?

Recovery from Social Anxiety and Related Conditions

How Can We Offset Negative Neural Information?
How Can We Offset Negative Neural Information

Recent Posts

How Can We Offset Negative Neural Information?

Our brain’s neural network is inundated with abundant negative information from childhood disturbance, negative core and intermediate beliefs, low self-esteem, negativity bias, and social anxiety – not to mention the constant negativity of world events and life in general.  

Goal and Objectives

The primary goal of recovery from social anxiety is the mitigation of our irrational fears and apprehensions. In self-empowerment, it is the rebuilding of our self-esteem and motivation. We execute these goals through a three-pronged approach.

  1. Replace or overwhelm our negative thoughts and behaviors with healthy, productive ones.
  2. Produce rapid, concentrated positive stimulation to offset the abundance of negative information in our brain’s metabolism.
  3. Reclaim and rebuild our self-esteem and reintegrate into society through recognition and reinforcement of our character strengths, virtues, attributes, and achievements.

Our brain’s metabolism involves the complex chemical and electrical processes that impact our neural circuitry. Our neural network is the biological system of interconnected brain neurons that processes data. 

Positive neurological stimulation changes the polarity of our neural network from toxic to healthy.

The deliberate, repetitive neural input of information (DRNI) accelerates and consolidates the process. Through proactive neuroplasticity, we compel change rather than reacting or responding to it.

The obvious question is: How can a regiment of deliberate neural input – no matter how often we repeat and practice it – offset the abundance of negative information accumulated over decades?  

There are two factors to be mindful of: 

  • Abundance is defined as a larger quantity of something. Negative neural abundance means that our brain has accumulated a larger quantity of negative than positive information. The amount can be offset or overwhelmed with practice and repetition. 
  • Not all accessible information impacts our neural network. Our brain’s metabolism only accumulates registered information.
Rechanneling.org | Social Anxiety Recovery Workshops Online | Dr. Robert F. Mullen

Space is Limited
For Information

“It is one of the best investments I have made in myself, and I will
continue to improve and benefit from it for the rest of my life.” – Nick P.

Three forms of neuroplasticity:

  1. Reactive neuroplasticity is our brain’s response to accessible information – stimuli we do not initiate or may not register, such as a car alarm, lightning, or the smell of baked goods. Our neural network automatically restructures itself according to what we access. 
  2. Proactive neuroplasticity is our deliberate, repetitive neural input of information.
  3. Active neuroplasticity happens through pursuits like creating, yoga, and journaling.

Information Must Register

For something to register, it must be detected (noticed) and recorded. Obviously, proactive and active neuroplasticity are deliberate actions. We detect and record them because we initiate and control the process.

Our response to the majority of reactive information amassed over the years is nugatory. If the information has no personal relevance, it does not register, i.e., our brain’s metabolism does not detect and record it.

“Dr. Mullen is doing impressive work helping the world. He is the pioneer of proactive neuroplasticity utilizing DRNI – deliberate, repetitive, neural information.” – WeVoice (Madrid, Málaga)   

Our neural network receives around two million bits of data per second but can process roughly 126 bits. If our brain does not register the information, our receptor neurons are not stimulated, and subsequently, nothing is forwarded to participating neurons (pre– and post-synaptic and onward). Proactive and active neuroplasticity are intentional inputs and, therefore, register.  

Proactive Neuroplasticity YouTube Series

Social Anxiety Recovery Workshops By Robert. F. Mullen | Rechanneling.org

WHY IS YOUR SUPPORT SO NECESSARY AND ESSENTIAL?  ReChanneling develops and implements programs to (1) mitigate symptoms of social anxiety and related conditions and (2) pursue personal goals and objectives – harnessing our intrinsic aptitude for extraordinary living. Our paradigmatic approach targets the personality through empathy, collaboration, and program integration utilizing neuroscience and psychology, including proactive neuroplasticity, cognitive-behavioral modification, positive psychology, and techniques designed to regenerate self-esteem. All donations support scholarships for groups and workshops.   

INDIVIDUAL RECOVERY. The symptoms of social anxiety make it challenging for some to participate in a collective workshop. Dr. Mullen works one-on-one with a select group of individuals uneasy in a group setting. ReChanneling offers scholarships to accommodate the costs. What is absent in group activities is provided in our monthly, no-cost Graduate Recovery Group. In this supportive community, graduates interact with others who have completed the program.  Contact ‘rmullenphd@gmail.com’.        

Committing to recovery is one of the hardest things you will ever do.
It takes enormous courage and the realization that you are of value,
consequential, and deserving of happiness.

Devising Rational Coping Statements

Recovery from Social Anxiety and Related Conditions

Robert F. Mullen, PhD
Director/ReChanneling

For each new subscriber, ReChanneling donates $25 for workshop scholarships.

Devising Rational Coping Statements
Devising Rational Coping Statements

Recent Posts

The distinction between social anxiety and social anxiety disorder is in severity. We are not all affected by the same symptoms or relentlessness. The characteristics and traits are equivalent. These conditions originate homogeneously, their trajectories differentiated by environment, experience, and the diversity of human thought and behavior. While comorbidities dramatically benefit, the recovery methods identified are for social anxiety and social anxiety disorder, and reference to one includes the other.

Devising Rational Coping Statements

Coping Mechanisms

Coping mechanisms are tools that enable us to manage our emotions, alleviate anxiety, and navigate stress. They encompass a wide range of strategies, from learned skills like distractions and visualization to natural responses such as hiking or listening to music.

Cognitive coping mechanisms enable us to craft rational responses to irrational thoughts, while behavioral coping mechanisms equip us with the means to adjust our actions.

Among the many coping mechanisms, three stand out for their effectiveness in situations where we anticipate fear—that is, those scheduled in advance that we project will trigger stress and anxiety. These can be single events, such as a job interview or a social gathering, or recurring ones, like a daily or weekly class or work environment.

In contrast, unexpected situations catch us off guard, bringing stress-provoking incidents like a plumbing failure, an unexpected guest, or missing house keys.

Three Effective Coping Mechanisms

The three coping mechanisms are grounding, which involves redirecting our anxiety into present-moment awareness; cognitive reframing, where we consciously choose to see a circumstance in a more positive light; and rational coping statements, which are logical, self-affirming statements aimed at counteracting automatic negative thoughts (ANTs) that arise in fear situations.

Once we have learned and practiced the nuances of cognitive reframing and grounding, we can apply them almost spontaneously, during any fear situation. On the other hand, rational coping statements are most effective when explicitly prepared for an anticipated fear situation.

This writing outlines the process of devising rational coping statements in anticipation of fear-inducing situations. Cognitive reframing and grounding will be covered in the following weeks.

Dr. Mullen is doing impressive work helping the world. He is the
pioneer of proactive neuroplasticity, utilizing DRNI – deliberate,
repetitive, neural information. – WeVoice (Madrid, Málaga)   

Automatic Negative Thoughts

Automatic negative thoughts (ANTs), also called negative automatic thoughts (NATs), are the immediate, involuntary, anxiety-provoking thoughts that pop into our heads when we are in a fear-inducing situation.

ANTs are irrational assumptions rooted in our negative core and intermediate beliefs, as well as the self-defeating symptoms of our condition. For example, automatic negative thinking during a fear situation might include phrases such as, ‘I will be rejected,’ ‘No one will talk to me,’ ‘I don’t belong here,’ and ‘I am not undesirable.’

By challenging these ANTs with reason and positive self-validation, we can regain control and prevent them from dictating our actions. This is the power of rational coping statements.

Rational Coping Statements

Rational coping statements are logical, self-affirming responses to our situational fears, anxieties, and automatic negative thoughts. For instance, if we are afraid of rejection, a rational coping statement might be, ‘I belong here as much as anyone,’ ‘I am valuable and significant,’ or ‘I am approachable and likeable.’

These statements are designed to directly counteract the negative thoughts and feelings provoked by our negative self-appraisal. Essentially, they are provisional, positive personal affirmations designed for anticipated fear situations.

Rational coping statements are accurate, self-affirming responses to our unreasonable, self-defeating thoughts. Remember, our fears and anxieties are not real. They may feel real, but that is a cognitive distortion called emotional reasoning, which involves forming judgments and decisions based solely on our emotions, disregarding evidence to the contrary.

Anxiety is an abstraction; it has no power on its own. We create and feed it, making it real and giving it strength and power.

The first step in managing our ANTs is to recognize that our fears are not based on facts, but assumptions rooted in our past experiences, imagination, and reactions to perceived threats. A horror flick may stimulate our terrors, but they are alleviated once we leave the movie house. The power of our trepidations lies in our acceptance of them as reality rather than perception.  

It’s not the fears that adversely impact our emotional well-being; it’s the things we do to avoid them. Our goal in recovery is to eliminate the anxiety responsible for the expression of the ANT by examining and analyzing its causes. Since the fear is irrational, logic dictates that the corresponding ANT is also. Thoughts such as ‘I don’t belong here’ and ‘I am not welcome’ are subjective projections.

Social Anxiety Recovery Workshops Online | Rechanneling.org | Dr. Robert F. Mullen

Space is Limited
For Information

It is one of the best investments I have made in myself, and I will
continue to improve and benefit from it for the rest of my life.
– Nick P.   

The following strategy is designed to help us develop rational coping statements to counteract our ANTs.

Steps to Devising Rational Coping Statements

  1. Identify Our Fear Situation
  2. Identify Our Associated Fear(s)
  3. Unmask Our Corresponding ANT(s)
  4. Examine and Analyze the Cause(s) of Our Associated Fear(s) and Corresponding ANT(s)
  5. Generate Rational Coping Statements

Fear Situation

First, we identify the anticipated fear situations that provoke our fears. Where do we feel anxious or fearful? What activities are we engaged in, and what thoughts arise? Is it a networking event, speaking in front of the class, a social engagement, a family dinner, or a trip to the public swimming pool? They’re different for everyone. Most of us have multiple fear situations.

Associated Fears

Next, we unpack the actual fears associated with the fear situation. What is problematic for me during this fear situation? How do I feel (physically, intellectually, emotionally, spiritually)? What activities are we engaging in? What is being said? What’s the worst outcome we project happening? What might occur?

Corresponding ANTs

Then, we unmask our corresponding ANTs. What do we tell ourselves when triggered?  How do we perceive ourselves in these moments? What are our self-defeating responses to these triggers?

Examine and Analyze Our Associated Fears and Corresponding ANTS

We know our fears and ANTs are irrational and self-destructive reflections of our negative self-appraisal. By examining and analyzing the reasons behind them, we view them in the context of the situation. Are they practical? Are they real or false assumptions? How would a confident, self-assured individual respond to them?

Devise Rational Coping Statements

Finally, we devise our rational coping statements. This is a relatively simple process. We respond to our irrational, automatic negative thoughts by devising reasonable, logical, self-supporting, and empowering statements.

Eventually, we will confront our fear situation in real life. This happens once we have resolved and practiced steps 1-5, and after a suitable period of graded exposure. i.e., gradually reducing the intensity of our fears and anxieties in a workshop environment and through external exercises.

Proactive Neuroplasticity YouTube Series

Social Anxiety Recovery Workshops Online | Rechanneling.org | Dr. Robert F. Mullen

WHY IS YOUR SUPPORT SO NECESSARY AND ESSENTIAL?  ReChanneling develops and conducts programs to alleviate the symptoms of social anxiety and help individuals tap into their innate potential for extraordinary living. Our unique approach focuses on understanding personality through empathy and collaboration, integrating neuroscience and psychology. This includes proactive neuroplasticity, cognitive-behavioral modification, positive psychology, and techniques designed to reclaim and rebuild self-esteem. Every contribution, no matter the size, supports individuals striving to make a positive change in their own lives and the lives of others. All donations go towards scholarships for groups and workshops.

INDIVIDUAL RECOVERY. The symptoms of social anxiety make it challenging for some to participate in a collective workshop. Dr. Mullen works one-on-one with a select group of individuals uneasy in a group setting. ReChanneling offers scholarships to accommodate the costs. What is absent in group activities is provided in our monthly Graduate Recovery Group. In this supportive community, graduates interact with others who have completed the program.  Contact ‘rmullenphd@gmail.com’.

Committing to recovery is one of the hardest things you will ever do.
It takes enormous courage and the realization that you are of value, 
consequential, and deserving of happiness.

Winding Roads: A Profile of Robert F. Mullen

Guest Post

For each new subscriber, ReChanneling donates $25 for workshop scholarships.

Winding Roads: A Profile of Robert F. Mullen
Winding Roads: AI Generated

Recent Posts

As many of you know, I have the distinct advantage of experiencing severe social anxiety disorder for the first half of my life, and extensively studying how it impacts each of us, creating recovery options in the second half. This shared experience, combined with my academic studies and practical application, provides a distinctive perspective. Everything I have experienced in my life influences who I am today, and I wouldn’t change or forget any of it.  Experts believe that the most effective analysts and facilitators of recovery from social anxiety are those who have lived in the sewer and escaped to share the path out of it into the light and freedom of emotional well-being. – Robert F. Mullen

Winding Roads: A Profile of Robert F. Mullen

by Madelyn Winger

Writing in Various Settings
San Diego State University
October 13, 2024
Revised: August 15, 2025

Diverse Paths

The thought that we only have one life to live can be daunting. There’s an idea that we are limited to only one profession and excel in it throughout a lifetime. There are some people, like Dr. Robert F. Mullen, who challenge this concept. He has navigated a diverse career path, from the entertainment industry to corporate negotiations to helping clients who suffer from Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD).

Mullen’s dark eyes light up behind his glasses when he talks about his work with anxiety and depression, discussing the recovery approaches he’s pioneered, which have significantly improved the lives of his clients. His experiences working with students and conducting workshops have been instrumental in shaping his understanding of SAD. One might assume from his graying hair that Mullen has been in this field for his entire adult life, but it was a relatively recent change. He concluded his Ph.D. studies in his early fifties.

Lived Experiences

Dr. Mullen has lived many lives in this one and has found a way to bring his lived experiences together, turning them into a passion for helping others. His dedication and empathy in this field are truly inspiring. 

He took many different paths to get him to where he is today. He spent years working in the entertainment industry – from playwriting and directing to teaching Stanislavski, familiarizing himself with every B-list actor (his words) in Hollywood. As a performer, he earned his Equity card working with James Burrows and Bob Crane at San Diego’s Off-Broadway Theatre, and his SAG membership staring up from the cutting room floor of Report to the Commissioner.

Dr. Mullen is doing impressive work helping the world. He is the pioneer of proactive neuroplasticity, utilizing DRNI – deliberate, repetitive, neural information. – WeVoice (Madrid, Málaga)   

Early Life

Much of this was during what he calls his “delinquent” era, where his stories are better kept secret, credit given to his severe social anxiety disorder. He did, however, have a few stories to share, such as living with Brenda Dickson, star of The Young and the Restless, partying with Sal Mineo, or getting underage drunk at the Insomniac in Hermosa Beach with Caesar and Cleo, later known as Sonny and Cher.

Family

He speaks fondly about this time, but it was also a decade-long period where he distanced himself from his family, leaving behind three young nephews: Brian, Kevin, and Geoff. When asked to identify what prompted his return to the fold, Mullen once stated, “I don’t think anyone knows why they do anything. It’s a whole cacophony of things.”

His return to his family marked a significant turning point in his life, reflecting his growing understanding of the importance of human connection. Now, as a humanist who believes in the inherent potential and capacity of humankind, he has revised his thinking.  

Post Graduate

Dr. Mullen’s lived experiences became better understood in university when he first learned of the existence of social anxiety disorder, recognizing how it had adversely impacted his life since adolescence. Exploring his affliction, which often left him feeling isolated and misunderstood, was a significant hurdle in his personal and professional life. It also fueled his passion for understanding and helping others experiencing similar struggles.

His return to university was, admittedly, due to government support, but his growing interest in psychology, religion, and philosophy soon molded his overriding perspective. With his PhD in tow, Mullen has spent the past fifteen years researching SAD and its comorbidities, pioneering proactive neuroplasticity and other innovative approaches to recovery.

Social Anxiety Recovery Workshops Online | Rechanneling.org

Space is Limited
For Information

It is one of the best investments I have made in myself, and I will
continue to improve and benefit from it for the rest of my life.
– Nick P.   

Neuroplasticity

Neuroplasticity refers to the brain’s ability to reorganize and adapt to new information more quickly and effectively. The deliberate, repetitive neural input (DRNI) of information, a concept he developed, involves consciously and repeatedly exposing the brain to positive, productive thoughts and behaviors to replace the accumulated toxicity in our neural network.

Mullen’s unwavering commitment to scientific inquiry is a cornerstone of his approach. As a radical behaviorist, he considers a wide range of thoughts from philosophy and psychology to spiritual perspectives to gain a deeper understanding of those he serves. 

Career

Mullen’s life is now centered around his work and his passion for helping others. He starts his mornings with writing, finding a sense of purpose and permanency in it. Currently, he is focused on finishing a book about recovery from social anxiety. In addition to writing, He loves everything about working with people, and although it can be challenging at times, he thrives on their growth and transformation.

His personal experiences, having lived through similar situations, allow him to empathize with his clients: “I have been where you are now, and I want to show you that there is a way out. I know the controlling, devious, and manipulative nature of this disorder” (Mullen).

Turning something negative into a positive and productive part of life is an incredible achievement for individuals experiencing social anxiety

Influences

While he might not fully understand how his earlier life connects to his current one, Mullen credits many of the people he worked with, including Dr. Edith Eva Eger, who shared stories about dancing as a young girl for the angel of death, Josef Mengele, and John Cleese, a member of Monty Python. Although he is not actively working in television and film, Mullen still enjoys attending the theater and improvisational groups to watch and participate.

As someone who had to learn to value relationships, Dr. Mullen makes sure to stay in contact with his nephews, as he sees each as a personification of his own life. Brian is most like him, a family-oriented workaholic who also overcame a troubled adolescence. Kevin is the compassionate nephew with an enduring zest for life, and Geoff shares Robert’s talent for writing.

The Winding Road

Mullen’s journey is a testament to the idea that life is not a straight path but a series of winding roads, each offering unique lessons and opportunities. His ability to pivot from the entertainment industry to helping others navigate their struggles with social anxiety exemplifies the power of resilience and perseverance.

He shows us that it’s never too late to make a change. and commends those who travel diverse paths to discover their life’s niche. The legacy he leaves behind is rooted in his unwavering dedication to witnessing others find their way out of darkness, a passion for knowledge and exploration, and the belief that we can all make a difference.

Ultimately, Dr. Mullen’s career reflects the understanding that professional trajectories are rarely linear, instead comprising winding paths replete with distinct lessons and possibilities. These lessons include the importance of empathy, the value of diverse perspectives, and the power of resilience. Mullen’s legacy extends beyond individual accomplishments—it embodies his unwavering dedication to helping others, passion for continual learning, and the ability to transform personal challenges into meaningful contributions.

__________

Madelyn is majoring in communication at San Diego State University. She enjoys reading and rock climbing and aspires to build a career that enables her to make a positive impact on others, although she is still exploring the specific path that she may take.  

Proactive Neuroplasticity YouTube Series

Social Anxiety Recovery Workshops Online | Rechanneling.org

WHY IS YOUR SUPPORT SO NECESSARY AND ESSENTIAL?  ReChanneling develops and conducts programs to alleviate the symptoms of social anxiety and help individuals tap into their innate potential for extraordinary living. Our unique approach focuses on understanding personality through empathy and collaboration, integrating neuroscience and psychology. This includes proactive neuroplasticity, cognitive-behavioral modification, positive psychology, and techniques designed to reclaim and rebuild self-esteem. Every contribution, no matter the size, supports individuals striving to make a positive change in their own lives and the lives of others. All donations go towards scholarships for groups and workshops.

INDIVIDUAL RECOVERY. The symptoms of social anxiety make it challenging for some to participate in a collective workshop. Dr. Mullen works one-on-one with a select group of individuals uneasy in a group setting. ReChanneling offers scholarships to accommodate the costs. What is absent in group activities is provided in our monthly Graduate Recovery Group. In this supportive community, graduates interact with others who have completed the program.  Contact ‘rmullenphd@gmail.com’.              

Committing to recovery is one of the hardest things you will ever do.
It takes enormous courage and the realization that you are of value, 
consequential, and deserving of happiness. 

Complementarity

The Simultaneous Mutual Interaction of Mind, Body, Spirit, and Emotions

Recovery from Social Anxiety and Related Conditions

Robert F. Mullen, PhD
Director/ReChanneling

For each new subscriber, ReChanneling donates $25 for workshop scholarships.

Complementarity
Complementarity

Recent Posts

Complementarity

Understanding the holistic nature of our being is a journey into the intricate web of our mind, body, spirit, and emotions – the components of our behavior. These elements of our human holism are not separate entities, but intimately interconnected, each influencing and shaping the others. This interconnectedness is the essence of our emotional well-being.

Defining Our Behavioral Components

It’s easy to provide basic definitions for mind, body, and emotions. Many of us confuse the term ‘spirit’ due to its association with religion and spirituality. In the context of recovery, ‘spirit’ refers to our ongoing emotional state or disposition that influences our perceptions, thoughts, and behaviors.

Emotions versus Spirit

Emotions are temporary outbursts or subjective responses to people, situations, and objects that trigger strong feelings and behavioral responses. Unlike emotions, which are typically intense and short-lived reactions to specific triggers, our spirit is a more enduring emotional state or disposition that is influenced by our fundamental, rigid beliefs.

These beliefs set the tone for interpreting and responding to the world around us, making our spirit a key aspect of our holistic health.

Complementarity refers to the interconnectedness and mutual influence of our behavioral components:  mind, body, spirit, and emotions. Understanding this concept can equip us with the knowledge to manage stress effectively.

How does complementarity work? During a fear situation, something triggers us. A trigger refers to a thing, person, or event that elicits a reaction due to its association with some past trauma. This trigger or stimulus alerts our mind, body, spirit, and emotions simultaneously.

Dr. Mullen is doing impressive work helping the world. He is the
pioneer of proactive neuroplasticity, utilizing DRNI – deliberate, repetitive, neural information. – WeVoice (Madrid, Málaga)   

Trauma Defined

Trauma can be a scary and misunderstood term. It refers to any disturbing experience that results in disruptive or discomforting feelings intense enough to have a long-lasting adverse effect on our optimal functioning. These unsettling events activate the amygdala, which responds by sending out an alarm to multiple body systems to prepare for defense. 

Mutual Interaction of Our Behavior Components

Let me provide a hypothetical example. During a fear situation, such as a social event, a trigger might generate automatic negative thoughts such as “No one will talk to me” or “I’ll do something stupid” (Mind). We express these thoughts through our reactions and responses (Emotions). We feel stress and other physical discomfort (Body). And we feel incompetent and inferior (Spirit).

This simultaneous mutual interaction is an example of complementarity in action.

Complementarity reflects the enduring interconnectedness of our four behavior components: mind, body, spirit, and emotions. Connection is the essence of mental health; disconnection is a sign of brokenness.

Complementarity: Virtually Simultaneous Mutual Interaction

Utilizing Complementarity

How do we use complementarity to our advantage? We rechannel our anxiety or stress from one component to another. It’s crucial to recognize that we always have avenues of release for any form of discomfort. This awareness prepares us to manage stress effectively.

Through complementarity, we redirect unmanageable emotions – intense and overwhelming feelings that can disrupt our mental and emotional well-being – through physical activity, mental distractions, or spiritual contemplationWe engage in ‘B’ (physical activity), ‘C’ (mental distractions), or ‘D’ (mood reframing) to mitigate ‘A’ (the unmanageable emotion).

Examples of Complementarity

We walk to calm our angst, meditate when agitated, or solve a crossword puzzle to counter anxiety. If the component under stress is physical (such as palpitations, nausea, or tremors), we focus on a mental, emotional, or dispositional (spirit) state to compensate. If it is mental, we focus on a physical, emotional, or dispositional state.

Our mind, body, spirit, and emotions are not isolated entities, but interconnected. They act jointly, each influencing the other, although not always in equal measure. Depending on the situation and subjective response, one component takes precedence over the others.

Rechanneling.org | Social Anxiety Recovery Workshops With Dr. Robert F. Mullen

Space is Limited
For Information

It is one of the best investments I have made in myself, and I will
continue to improve and benefit from it for the rest of my life.
– Nick P.

Consider the aftermath of a freeway fender-bender. Our brain becomes chaotic with competing thoughts. Physically, we experience discomfort, if not whiplash. We’re emotionally angry and frustrated and suddenly aware of our mortality.

If we are in pain, the physical likely takes precedence. If we are slightly inebriated, it might be the mental (can I talk my way out of it?), it might be the emotional fear of being arrested, or it might be the dispositional sense of futility.

Managing Complementarity

There are various techniques we learn in recovery to help us redirect our stress. Cognitive reframing, a powerful tool in CBT, enables us to identify our anxiety triggers and gain control over our perspective. For example, if a social event triggers feelings of inadequacy, we can reframe it as an opportunity to improve our social skills, thereby boosting our confidence.

Grounding is a practical coping strategy that involves redirecting situational anxiety by intentionally focusing on the objects, sounds, smells, tastes, and sensations around us. Other methods include using distractions and diversions, focusing on character and persona to change our perspective, and controlled breathing to shift energy by stimulating our vagus nerve.

As we journey through recovery, we gain the power to consciously manipulate our mind, body, spirit, and emotions to our advantage. This enables us to redirect or reframe the anxiety that threatens our emotional well-being. In a broader sense, we take control of our reactions and responses rather than allowing our condition to dominate our thoughts and behavior.

Proactive Neuroplasticity YouTube Series

Rechanneling.org | Social Anxiety Recovery Workshops With Dr. Robert F. Mullen

WHY IS YOUR SUPPORT SO NECESSARY AND ESSENTIAL?  ReChanneling develops and conducts programs to alleviate the symptoms of social anxiety and help individuals tap into their innate potential for extraordinary living. Our unique approach focuses on understanding personality through empathy and collaboration, integrating neuroscience and psychology. This includes proactive neuroplasticity, cognitive-behavioral modification, positive psychology, and techniques designed to reclaim and rebuild self-esteem. Every contribution, no matter the size, supports individuals striving to make a positive change in their own lives and the lives of others. All donations go towards scholarships for groups and workshops.

INDIVIDUAL RECOVERY. The symptoms of social anxiety make it challenging for some to participate in a collective workshop. Dr. Mullen works one-on-one with a select group of individuals uneasy in a group setting. ReChanneling offers scholarships to accommodate the costs. What is absent in group activities is provided in our monthly Graduate Recovery Group. In this supportive community, graduates interact with others who have completed the program.  Contact ‘rmullenphd@gmail.com’.

Committing to recovery is one of the hardest things you will ever do.
It takes enormous courage and the realization that you are of value, 
consequential, and deserving of happiness.